Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX<br />
G<br />
BACK-UP<br />
STRUCTURES<br />
There are four primary methods for limiting the<br />
deflections <strong>of</strong> an antenna structure 'that appear to be<br />
usable for the <strong>Cyclops</strong> design.<br />
MAXIMUM STIFFNESS APPROACH<br />
This is the time-honored procedure that has been<br />
used by structural engineers for designing buildings,<br />
bridges, etc. It has the distinct disadvantage <strong>of</strong> requiring<br />
more material compared with other methods, to achieve<br />
the desired result. This method is useful to the <strong>Cyclops</strong><br />
design only if structural members can be incorporated<br />
for multiple use-for example, incorporating the reflector<br />
surface <strong>and</strong> backup structure into some sort <strong>of</strong><br />
semimonocoque type <strong>of</strong> arrangement.<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
SHIELDING<br />
A radome may be placed over the antenna to shield it<br />
from wind <strong>and</strong> thermal effects. According to reference<br />
1, this approach gives a total structural cost that may be<br />
appreciably below the typical cost curves for all current<br />
existing antenna designs. (Although our study here does<br />
not necessarily confirm this finding.)<br />
BEST-FIT<br />
PROCEDURE<br />
It is possible to reduce the rms deviation by fitting a<br />
paraboloid <strong>of</strong> revolution to the distorted surface for the<br />
various angles <strong>of</strong> tilt <strong>of</strong> the dish. The so.called "homologous<br />
design" as discussed in reference 2 is a further<br />
exploration <strong>of</strong> this method. Figure 8-2 from reference 2<br />
shows the so-called "natural" limits that exist for a<br />
steerable antenna. Assuming that the rms deviation for<br />
the <strong>Cyclops</strong> antenna elements is between 1 mm <strong>and</strong> 3<br />
mm, it can be observed from Figure 8-2 that it is<br />
possible to construct dishes with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70<br />
m without violating the gravitational limit. For dishes in<br />
excess <strong>of</strong> these dimensions, it is necessary to employ a<br />
refinement in structural analysis or design to meet the<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> rms deviation. Regardless <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong><br />
the dish to be selected, a best fit procedure should be<br />
used to minimize the rms error <strong>and</strong> total structural<br />
weight.<br />
THE USE OF MECHANICALLY<br />
ELEMENTS<br />
ACTIVATED<br />
If the antenna element is fitted with force or<br />
deformation compensating devices so that excessive<br />
deflections can be removed, then the structural elements<br />
can be made much lighter. These compensation devices<br />
can consist <strong>of</strong> hydraulic jacks, that are properly arranged<br />
counterweights. According to reference 1 it is possible to<br />
accomplish proper compensation with as few as three<br />
opposing force systems. This approach seems to lack<br />
appeal for the <strong>Cyclops</strong> array because, with the large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> elements, the problem <strong>of</strong> maintenance<br />
appears to outweigh any savings represented by initial<br />
cost<br />
savings.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. A Large Radio-Radar Telescope Proposal for a<br />
Research Facility. (4 vol.) Northeast Radio Observatory<br />
Corp., June 1970.<br />
2. A 300 Foot High High-Precision Radio Telescope.<br />
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green<br />
Bank, West Virginia, May 1969.<br />
Preceding pal[eblank<br />
205