01.09.2014 Views

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

islessfor shortranges, increases asthefifth power<strong>of</strong><br />

range(thepowerperantennaincreases asR 2 <strong>and</strong> m<br />

increases as R3), <strong>and</strong> so intersects the power required for<br />

an omnidirectional beacon. The line labeled ZA t = A r is<br />

the locus for which the total transmitting antenna area<br />

equals the receiving antenna area <strong>of</strong> the assumed<br />

receiving system. The curves assume that m is equal to<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> F, G, <strong>and</strong> K stars within the indicated<br />

ranges; m = R31440. The scale <strong>of</strong> m is shown along the<br />

top.<br />

I0 9<br />

IO 8<br />

ASSUMEDRECEIVER:<br />

m=NUMBER OF ANTENNAS=NUMBER OF<br />

F,, G, K STAR S<br />

I I01 I0 2 10 3 I0 4 105 106<br />

i i i I<br />

ANTENNADIAMETER 3kin<br />

NOISE TEMPERATURE20* K<br />

BANDWIDTH<br />

O,t HZ<br />

/<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

/<br />

I<br />

/<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

We conclude that long-range beacons will be omnidirectional<br />

Power<br />

<strong>and</strong> high powered.<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> Beacons<br />

How much power might we expect in an omnidirectional<br />

beacon? If we make the assumption that all races<br />

end up transmitting omnidirectional beacons as well as<br />

searching with directive receivers, then the proper<br />

beacon power is that which minimizes the total system<br />

cost for all races involved. The total system cost will<br />

increase as the search is carried to greater ranges, but at<br />

any assumed range limit, it can be minimized.<br />

The efficacy <strong>of</strong> a beacon-search-receiver combination<br />

is proportional to PtAr where Pt is the beacon power<br />

<strong>and</strong> A r is the receiving antenna area. At both ends these<br />

factors represent the most costly items. Any race deciding<br />

to transmit as well as receive will decide that the<br />

other races will also be doing both for similar reasons,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that all would have the goal <strong>of</strong> minimizing the total<br />

system cost. The total cost includes many terms but a<br />

dominating one will be<br />

rr<br />

m=m<br />

O<br />

ft.<br />

laJ<br />

I---<br />

Q<br />

IO 7<br />

OMNIDIRECTIONAL<br />

I<br />

/<br />

/<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i,<br />

where<br />

C = KpP t + KAA r (22)<br />

iv"<br />

_I0 6<br />

I,-<br />

0<br />

I--<br />

10,5<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

I0 4<br />

I IO I I0 2 IO 3<br />

/<br />

I<br />

i<br />

RANGE LIMIT, lighl years<br />

Figure 6-6. Beacon power versus range.<br />

We see that if we had a receiving array <strong>of</strong> a thous<strong>and</strong><br />

100-m dishes, we might use it as a beacon to illuminate<br />

the stars out to about 76 light-years (or perhaps a<br />

narrower spectral class, say G stars, to a greater range)<br />

but beyond 100 to 200 light-years we would almost<br />

certainly construct a separate omnidirectional beacon.<br />

Kp = cost per unit power capacity <strong>of</strong> transmitter<br />

K A = cost per unit area <strong>of</strong> antenna.<br />

If the product PtAr is held constant, C will be a<br />

minimum when<br />

KpP t = KAA r (23)<br />

Nuclear power costs about $300/kW <strong>of</strong> generating<br />

capacity. The conversion <strong>of</strong> this power to monochromatic<br />

microwave power costs about $1200/kW. Let<br />

us therefore take Kp = $2000/kW. If we are willing to<br />

spend KAA r = $4X 109 for antennas we should also be<br />

willing to spend this same amount for beacons, which<br />

makes Pt = 2X 106 kW or 2000 MW. These figures are<br />

technology dependent, but it appears not unreasonable<br />

to expect beacon powers in excess <strong>of</strong> 1000 MW.<br />

Other Properties <strong>of</strong> Beacons<br />

In addition to having high powers, beacons would<br />

have other properties that make them easy to detect:<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!