01.09.2014 Views

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIXK<br />

EFFECTOF DISPERSION IN COAXIALS<br />

The propagation constant <strong>of</strong> a coaxial line in which<br />

the dielectric loss <strong>of</strong> the insulating medium may be<br />

neglected<br />

is 7 = a + ifl, with<br />

line, we see that the loss contributes an excess phase <strong>of</strong><br />

t_. But t_ is the line loss in nepers, so the excess phase is<br />

one radian per neper <strong>of</strong> line loss. Since this phase is<br />

proportional to wl/2 rather than co, it does not<br />

represent a constant delay.<br />

v/_o_o( i/a) + ( l/b)<br />

a = £n (b/a)<br />

(DI/2<br />

(KI)<br />

(K2)<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the phase compensation schemes <strong>of</strong><br />

Figure 9-14 <strong>and</strong> 9-15 shows that with zero <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

frequency (6 = 0) <strong>and</strong> constant delay lines there is zero<br />

phase error. To determine the errors caused by the<br />

second term <strong>of</strong> equation (K3) we need merely repeat the<br />

analysis considering this term to be the only phase<br />

where<br />

present.<br />

a = outer radius <strong>of</strong> inner conductor<br />

b = inner radius <strong>of</strong> outer conductor<br />

e = dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> dielectric medium<br />

/a = permeability <strong>of</strong> dielectric medium <strong>and</strong> conductors<br />

Let No be the line loss in nepers at co = Wo. Then the<br />

loss at any frequency<br />

is<br />

N = No -- O.2 _1/2<br />

(K4)<br />

, \_o!<br />

o = conductivity <strong>of</strong> conductors<br />

Equations (1) <strong>and</strong> (2) cannot be obtained from the<br />

equivalent circuit representation <strong>of</strong> a transmission line,<br />

which yields "y = x/ (R + iwL ) (G + i_oC), but must be<br />

derived directly from Maxwell's equations (ref. 1).<br />

If the line length is £, then the total phase shift 0 is<br />

For convenience the circuits <strong>of</strong> Figures 9-14 <strong>and</strong> 9-15<br />

are reproduced here as Figures K-1 <strong>and</strong> K-2, with /5<br />

assumed to be zero as a result <strong>of</strong> phase locking the<br />

remote oscillator. The line losses are from the central<br />

station to the point in question along the line.<br />

error<br />

We see that for the system <strong>of</strong> Figure K-I the phase<br />

is<br />

0 = -/3£ = -(co V_ £ + c_Q) (K3)<br />

Since the first term in (3) is tile phase shift we would<br />

expect from the delay % = _ £ <strong>of</strong> a dispersionless<br />

A01<br />

¢.0i._1 _ 1/2 .I/2-IIN0<br />

_o/ x,6°<strong>of</strong> J<br />

(K5)<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!