01.09.2014 Views

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Using huge specially designed jigs for f'mal assembly<br />

<strong>and</strong> erection<br />

An antenna designed for mass production could use<br />

cigar shaped major structural members rolled <strong>and</strong> welded<br />

from plate or sheet stock. All structural members could<br />

be cut to finished length <strong>and</strong> drilled on numerically<br />

controlled machines. Radial trusses could be assembled<br />

in large jigs that eliminate the need for any alignment or<br />

measurement. Partially automated welding or even complete<br />

one stop brazing <strong>of</strong> the entire truss might be<br />

possible. Surface panels could be stamped into double<br />

curved surfaces <strong>and</strong> formed with stiffening edge lips in<br />

large single-shot presses. Stamped channels with preformed<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles could be affixed to the rear <strong>of</strong> the panels<br />

by multiple-head, automatically sequenced spot welders.<br />

Completed trusses <strong>and</strong> panels could be assembled at the<br />

antenna site on a large lazy susan jig which could also<br />

serve to raise a completed dish into position on the<br />

mount. Special vehicles would convey the finished parts<br />

from the on-site factory to the antenna location.<br />

The structures group discussed the possible savings<br />

due to quantity production <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Cyclops</strong> antenna<br />

element (assumed to be a l O0-m az-el mounted dish)<br />

with a large shipbuilding firm, two leading engineering<br />

firms, a prominent "think-tank," a large aerospace<br />

corporation <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> antenna manufacturers. As<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> these discussions <strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sophistries <strong>of</strong> learning theory a total cost reduction from<br />

mass production <strong>of</strong> 20 to 40% was estimated.<br />

Others feel that this estimate is too conservative <strong>and</strong><br />

that full-scale inventive application <strong>of</strong> the arsenal <strong>of</strong><br />

mass production techniques could result in a cost<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> 60 to 70%. This question can be resolved<br />

only by a full scale design study, which <strong>of</strong> course was<br />

impossible to accomplish in the summer study period.<br />

The following table gives estimated total structural<br />

costs for the <strong>Cyclops</strong> array as computed from equation<br />

(10) with r7= 0.8 <strong>and</strong> for mass production cost reduction<br />

factors R = 0.7 <strong>and</strong> R = 0.4. For the latter case a tooling<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> $200 million has been added.<br />

TABLE 8-3<br />

ESTIMATED STRUCTURAL COSTS FOR<br />

CYCLOPS<br />

ARRAYS<br />

Equivalent Cost in $ Billions<br />

diameter, km R = 0.7 R = 0.4*<br />

! 1. 0.78<br />

2 4. 2.5<br />

3 9. 5.2<br />

5 25. 14.<br />

*Includes $200 million tooling costs<br />

Assuming an ultimate size <strong>of</strong> 5 km for <strong>Cyclops</strong> we see<br />

that the structures cost is in the $10 to $25 billion<br />

range. Since this is the dominating cost <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

<strong>Cyclops</strong> system, a large study aimed at reducing this<br />

figure <strong>and</strong> refining the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the estimate would<br />

appear to be the first order <strong>of</strong> business.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

During the course <strong>of</strong> this study, the element design<br />

group had the benefit <strong>of</strong> many helpful discussions from<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the industrial community. We sincerely<br />

appreciate <strong>and</strong> acknowledge the interest, information,<br />

<strong>and</strong> suggestions received from our meetings <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

written <strong>and</strong> phone conversations with the following<br />

firms <strong>and</strong> individuals:<br />

Philco-Ford Corporation (Palo Alto, Calif.)<br />

I.E. Lewis,<br />

R<strong>and</strong> Corporation (Los Angeles, Calif.)<br />

R. Melosh<br />

Milton Kamins, Sue Haggart<br />

Lockeed Corporation (Sunnyvale, Calif.)<br />

R.M. Rutledge,<br />

Bechtel Corporation (San Francisco, Calif.)<br />

V. Wise<br />

David J. Goerz, Jr.<br />

Bethlehem Steel Company (San Francisco, Calif.)<br />

E.J. Stuber, L.A. Napper<br />

Nippon Electric Company America, Inc. (N.Y.C., N.Y.)<br />

Robert Alarie<br />

Tymeshare Corporation (Mt. View, Calif.)<br />

Stanford University (Palo Alto, Calif.)<br />

Synergetics Corporation (Raleigh, N.C.)<br />

Rohr Corporation (Chula Vista, Calif.)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Ronald<br />

C. Love<br />

Bracewell<br />

T.C. Howard<br />

Robert<br />

1. Schuerch, Hans U.; <strong>and</strong> Hedgepeth, John M.: Large<br />

Hall<br />

Low Frequency Orbiting Telescope. NASA<br />

CR-1201, 1968.<br />

2. VLA Antenna Construction <strong>and</strong> Emplacement Study.<br />

Final Report, prepared by R.C.A. Defense Electronics<br />

Products Missile <strong>and</strong> Surface Radar Division,<br />

Moorestown, N.J., Nov. 1966.<br />

3. Potter, P.D.; Merrick, W.D.; <strong>and</strong> Ludwig, A.C.: Big<br />

Antenna Systems for Deep Space Communication.<br />

Astronautics <strong>and</strong> Aeronautics, vol. 4, no. I0, Oct.<br />

1966, pp. 85-95.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!