Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7. Using huge specially designed jigs for f'mal assembly<br />
<strong>and</strong> erection<br />
An antenna designed for mass production could use<br />
cigar shaped major structural members rolled <strong>and</strong> welded<br />
from plate or sheet stock. All structural members could<br />
be cut to finished length <strong>and</strong> drilled on numerically<br />
controlled machines. Radial trusses could be assembled<br />
in large jigs that eliminate the need for any alignment or<br />
measurement. Partially automated welding or even complete<br />
one stop brazing <strong>of</strong> the entire truss might be<br />
possible. Surface panels could be stamped into double<br />
curved surfaces <strong>and</strong> formed with stiffening edge lips in<br />
large single-shot presses. Stamped channels with preformed<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles could be affixed to the rear <strong>of</strong> the panels<br />
by multiple-head, automatically sequenced spot welders.<br />
Completed trusses <strong>and</strong> panels could be assembled at the<br />
antenna site on a large lazy susan jig which could also<br />
serve to raise a completed dish into position on the<br />
mount. Special vehicles would convey the finished parts<br />
from the on-site factory to the antenna location.<br />
The structures group discussed the possible savings<br />
due to quantity production <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Cyclops</strong> antenna<br />
element (assumed to be a l O0-m az-el mounted dish)<br />
with a large shipbuilding firm, two leading engineering<br />
firms, a prominent "think-tank," a large aerospace<br />
corporation <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> antenna manufacturers. As<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> these discussions <strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sophistries <strong>of</strong> learning theory a total cost reduction from<br />
mass production <strong>of</strong> 20 to 40% was estimated.<br />
Others feel that this estimate is too conservative <strong>and</strong><br />
that full-scale inventive application <strong>of</strong> the arsenal <strong>of</strong><br />
mass production techniques could result in a cost<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> 60 to 70%. This question can be resolved<br />
only by a full scale design study, which <strong>of</strong> course was<br />
impossible to accomplish in the summer study period.<br />
The following table gives estimated total structural<br />
costs for the <strong>Cyclops</strong> array as computed from equation<br />
(10) with r7= 0.8 <strong>and</strong> for mass production cost reduction<br />
factors R = 0.7 <strong>and</strong> R = 0.4. For the latter case a tooling<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> $200 million has been added.<br />
TABLE 8-3<br />
ESTIMATED STRUCTURAL COSTS FOR<br />
CYCLOPS<br />
ARRAYS<br />
Equivalent Cost in $ Billions<br />
diameter, km R = 0.7 R = 0.4*<br />
! 1. 0.78<br />
2 4. 2.5<br />
3 9. 5.2<br />
5 25. 14.<br />
*Includes $200 million tooling costs<br />
Assuming an ultimate size <strong>of</strong> 5 km for <strong>Cyclops</strong> we see<br />
that the structures cost is in the $10 to $25 billion<br />
range. Since this is the dominating cost <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />
<strong>Cyclops</strong> system, a large study aimed at reducing this<br />
figure <strong>and</strong> refining the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the estimate would<br />
appear to be the first order <strong>of</strong> business.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
During the course <strong>of</strong> this study, the element design<br />
group had the benefit <strong>of</strong> many helpful discussions from<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the industrial community. We sincerely<br />
appreciate <strong>and</strong> acknowledge the interest, information,<br />
<strong>and</strong> suggestions received from our meetings <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
written <strong>and</strong> phone conversations with the following<br />
firms <strong>and</strong> individuals:<br />
Philco-Ford Corporation (Palo Alto, Calif.)<br />
I.E. Lewis,<br />
R<strong>and</strong> Corporation (Los Angeles, Calif.)<br />
R. Melosh<br />
Milton Kamins, Sue Haggart<br />
Lockeed Corporation (Sunnyvale, Calif.)<br />
R.M. Rutledge,<br />
Bechtel Corporation (San Francisco, Calif.)<br />
V. Wise<br />
David J. Goerz, Jr.<br />
Bethlehem Steel Company (San Francisco, Calif.)<br />
E.J. Stuber, L.A. Napper<br />
Nippon Electric Company America, Inc. (N.Y.C., N.Y.)<br />
Robert Alarie<br />
Tymeshare Corporation (Mt. View, Calif.)<br />
Stanford University (Palo Alto, Calif.)<br />
Synergetics Corporation (Raleigh, N.C.)<br />
Rohr Corporation (Chula Vista, Calif.)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Ronald<br />
C. Love<br />
Bracewell<br />
T.C. Howard<br />
Robert<br />
1. Schuerch, Hans U.; <strong>and</strong> Hedgepeth, John M.: Large<br />
Hall<br />
Low Frequency Orbiting Telescope. NASA<br />
CR-1201, 1968.<br />
2. VLA Antenna Construction <strong>and</strong> Emplacement Study.<br />
Final Report, prepared by R.C.A. Defense Electronics<br />
Products Missile <strong>and</strong> Surface Radar Division,<br />
Moorestown, N.J., Nov. 1966.<br />
3. Potter, P.D.; Merrick, W.D.; <strong>and</strong> Ludwig, A.C.: Big<br />
Antenna Systems for Deep Space Communication.<br />
Astronautics <strong>and</strong> Aeronautics, vol. 4, no. I0, Oct.<br />
1966, pp. 85-95.<br />
84