01.09.2014 Views

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Is it possible that living systems could be constructed<br />

from molecular subunits different from<br />

those making up our biosphere? Carbon, hydrogen,<br />

oxygen, <strong>and</strong> their numerous compounds are<br />

eminently suited to serve as the raw materials for<br />

living structures. It is not considered probable that<br />

living structures could be based on other chemistries<br />

or that they would survive the competition<br />

with carbon-, hydrogen-, <strong>and</strong> oxygen-based life if<br />

they were. It is noteworthy that all living forms on<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> not only have a common elemental composition,<br />

but are in fact composed <strong>of</strong> very similar<br />

molecular units-for example, amino acids, nucleotides,<br />

porphyrins <strong>and</strong> riboses-arranged in different<br />

ways. Living systems on other planets could<br />

well have similar fundamental components.<br />

Although the steps leading from the organic precursors<br />

to DNA are presently unknown, biologists are<br />

confident that one or more likely routes will be found.<br />

There is thus a general consensus among exobiologists<br />

that life has originated <strong>and</strong> is now present on the<br />

planetary systems <strong>of</strong> a large proportion <strong>of</strong> the stars in<br />

the<br />

Galaxy.<br />

BIOLOGICAL<br />

EVOLUTION<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> the emergence <strong>of</strong> the first living cells<br />

on <strong>Earth</strong> the atmosphere contained little or no oxygen,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the energy needs <strong>of</strong> the cell had to be derived from<br />

reactions other than direct oxidation. The energy was<br />

mostly derived from the pool <strong>of</strong> organic compounds<br />

built up by the processes already described, but may<br />

have included energy derived from a few inorganic<br />

compounds. Such anaerobic processes are still used<br />

today by a variety <strong>of</strong> primitive organisms. At some point<br />

in the early evolution <strong>of</strong> cellular systems, a mutation, or<br />

genetic change, gave certain organisms the ability to<br />

transform the energy <strong>of</strong> visible light into chemical<br />

energy stored in an oxidation-reduction system. The<br />

critical biochemical compound for this reaction is<br />

chlorophyll, in which the absorbed photons raise electrons<br />

to a higher energy le, _.1.An accompanying series <strong>of</strong><br />

reactions enabled the plants to extract CO2 molecules<br />

from the air, <strong>and</strong> reduce them with the new found<br />

energy to form the complex compounds making up the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the organism. The combined process is<br />

known as photosynthesis. The date at which photosynthesis<br />

began is still unclear, but Kvenvolden (ref. 21)<br />

has recently shown that pre-Cambrian rocks, in which<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>ossils are found, show an unusually high ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

_2C to '3C. Photosynthesis is known to discriminate<br />

between these carbon isotopes in the same way. This<br />

evidence suggests that photosynthesis was present on<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> 3.4 billion years ago.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the major results <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

photosynthetic system was an increasing amount <strong>of</strong><br />

molecular oxygen, formed by a by-product <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reaction, in the early atmosphere. At first the oxygen<br />

was probably used up fairly rapidly in oxidizing a wide<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> chemical substances. Later free oxygen became<br />

available for the oxidation <strong>of</strong> nutrients in living<br />

systems. Such oxidation possesses a clear advantage over<br />

the anaerobic system in that a great deal more energy<br />

per molecule <strong>of</strong> the organic nutrient is available to drive<br />

cellular reactions.<br />

Over the next three <strong>and</strong> a half billion years the<br />

primitive organisms slowly evolved into the vast array <strong>of</strong><br />

living systems we see today. The basic mechanism<br />

underlying this long epoch <strong>of</strong> biological evolution is the<br />

chance modification <strong>of</strong> the chemical structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

DNA molecule known as a mutation. Most mutations are<br />

detrimental. They give rise to lethal chemical structures<br />

<strong>and</strong> reactions in the cell or prevent vital ones. Very<br />

occasionally the reverse is true <strong>and</strong> the mutation is said<br />

to be favorable. A favorable mutation confers a greater<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> survival, since the cell can now compete more<br />

successfully for the available energy sources <strong>and</strong> can<br />

more successfully withst<strong>and</strong> the rigors <strong>of</strong> the environment.<br />

Over many generations the organisms possessing a<br />

favorable mutation will gradually displace those without<br />

the new characteristic. This process, known as natural<br />

selection, was proposed by Darwin (ref. 22) <strong>and</strong> independently<br />

by Wallace in the middle <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth<br />

century as a rational explanation for t.he whole history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> the widely differing species that<br />

make up the plant <strong>and</strong> animal kingdoms, although the<br />

genetic mechanism by which it operates was then<br />

unknown.<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> natural selection at once explained the<br />

phenomenon, previously attributed to divine will, that<br />

the vast majority <strong>of</strong> living organisms seem so perfectly<br />

fitted for the particular environments they occupy.<br />

Experimental evidence supporting the Darwinian hypothesis<br />

is now so complete that few have any major<br />

reservations as to its correctness.<br />

Evidence is available from the fossil record, <strong>and</strong> more<br />

recently from the studies <strong>of</strong> the comparative biochemistry<br />

<strong>of</strong> present-day species, to give us a reasonable<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> the sequence <strong>of</strong> events as new species<br />

emerged. Many died out en route either as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

changes in the physical environment, or by competition<br />

with superior mutants better able to use the available<br />

resources. A number <strong>of</strong> species reached a certain stage <strong>of</strong><br />

2O

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!