01.09.2014 Views

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

Project Cyclops, A Design... - Department of Earth and Planetary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L-4 we see that the length <strong>of</strong> IF cable to an antenna<br />

whose coordinates are x,y is<br />

sin y0<br />

x<br />

1 - cos 0<br />

-<br />

sin 0<br />

y+x<br />

0<br />

= y tan- + x<br />

2<br />

Y<br />

(L16)<br />

The maximum cable length is found by setting x equal<br />

to _ in equation (L16) <strong>and</strong> differentiating. The<br />

result is<br />

a<br />

£max cos(O/2) cos(rr/2m) (L17)<br />

Y<br />

a<br />

2 O = SECTOR<br />

SUPPLIED<br />

BY<br />

EACH<br />

_./ ._ MAIN<br />

_ I_ ,, TUNNEL<br />

2 /9<br />

= --<br />

zsin 0<br />

dy<br />

Lx/_ _y2<br />

tv tan -- + x/dx<br />

Oa2 y/tan 0 2<br />

2a tan (0/2) 4ma n<br />

= -- - tan --<br />

3 (0/2) 3_ 2m (LI 9)<br />

For the tunnel patterns we have been considering the<br />

data given in Table L-6<br />

TABLE L-6<br />

O m _max/a "_/a fl/9.o<br />

_r/2 2 1.4142 0.8488 1.2732<br />

lr/4 4 1.0824 0.7032 1.0548<br />

rr/6 6 1.0353 0.6823 1.0235<br />

0 oo 1.0000 0.6666 1.0000<br />

The case 0 = 0 corresponds to having an individual<br />

straight tunnel for each IF line, <strong>and</strong> gives the minimum<br />

possible lengtla. We see that the hexagonal lattice with 6<br />

main tunnels (pattern 2b) has an average length only<br />

2.35% greater, that the square lattice with 4 main tunnels<br />

(pattern lb) has an average length only 5.5% greater,<br />

but that the patterns with only two main tunnels (the a<br />

patterns) increase the average length by over 27%.<br />

/ O /'<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> IF cabling can now be expressed<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> antennas n, <strong>and</strong> thek spacing<br />

s. For our purposes we can omit the term 1/2 in<br />

equations (L4) <strong>and</strong> (LS). Substitution into equation<br />

(LI 9) then gives for pattern la:<br />

Figure L-4. Distance through tunnels to an antenna<br />

The average cable length is very nearly that for a<br />

continuous distribution <strong>of</strong> end points (antennas); that is,<br />

for lb:<br />

8 n 312<br />

Lla - 3 rr s = 0.4789 na/2s (L20)<br />

_ f£dA<br />

f dA<br />

(L18)<br />

16 n 3/2<br />

Llb<br />

=<br />

-_- (V_'- 1)<br />

_<br />

n<br />

s = 0.3967na/2s (L21)<br />

for 2a:<br />

where dA is an element <strong>of</strong> the array area. Taking the<br />

integrals over the area between the main feeder tunnel<br />

<strong>and</strong> the x-axis (see Figure L.4), we have<br />

L2a ="3- 8 _ /'!3/2m n<br />

s = 0.4457 na/2s (L22)<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!