Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />
Theme F686 - N1123<br />
Fabrication and physical properties of EPDM/NBR/organoclay Nanocomposites<br />
M. Ersali 1 *, N. Fazeli 1 , Gh. Naderi 2<br />
1 Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Polymer Engineering Group,P.O.Box 14155/4933,Tehran, Iran<br />
2 Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Polymer Processing Society , P.O.Box 14965/115, Tehran, Iran<br />
Abstract Different blends based on 70 %(wt) ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM) and 30 %(wt) acrylonitrile butadiene rubber<br />
(NBR) with various amount of organoclay (OC) were prepared. The effect of organoclay on structures of the samples was investigated by X- ray<br />
Diffraction (XRD). The obtained results show an intercalated structure. The effect of organoclay on cure characteristics and physical properties<br />
of the samples was investigated. It has been observed that incorporation of organoclay into polymeric matrix increases the viscosity and crosslink<br />
density and shortens the scorch time and optimum cure time of the compounds. Significant improvement in abrasion resistance and compression<br />
set of EPDM/NBR nanocomposites were observed. The rebound resilience of nanocomposites decreased with increasing of the organoclay<br />
content.<br />
It has been long years that elastomeric blends have attracted<br />
the attentions. Some of their advantages are ease of process<br />
ability, better properties and manufacturing more inexpensive<br />
product. EPDM/NBR blends have both properties of each<br />
rubber such as oil and hydrocarbon resistance, ozone, heat and<br />
good process ability since it contains two types of polar and<br />
non polar rubbers [1]. nanoclay addition to polymer blends<br />
causes more improvements in their properties. This group of<br />
materials has attracted the attentions because of improving<br />
mechanical and thermal properties[2], diffusivity [3] and<br />
flammability resistance [4]. Since EPDM based<br />
nanocomposites have good oxygen, heat and ozone resistance<br />
and can be applied in different applications such as profiles,<br />
cable insulation, jackets, weather and heat resistant<br />
products[5]. On the other hand, NBR based nanocomposites<br />
have attracted attentions because of NBR excellent oil<br />
resistance, good tensile strength and abrasion resistance and<br />
also its applications such as static gaskets, oring, seal for<br />
valves, shafts for crankshafts, high pressure resistant hoses for<br />
hydraulic applications[6].<br />
The aim of this article was developing and making<br />
EPDM/NBR nano-composites through a melt compounding<br />
process by using organo-clay in the above blend and also<br />
studying the effect of organo-clay on curing characteristics,<br />
morphology and properties of the blend.<br />
Figure 1 shows XRD patterns for pure organoclay(OC) and<br />
nanocomposites.<br />
Figure 1- X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) OC 20A, (b) EPDM-NBR-7%OC,<br />
(c) EPDM-NBR-5%OC, (d) EPDM-NBR-3%OC.<br />
As it can be seen, the characteristic diffraction peak of cloisite<br />
20A is located at 2 =3.4 corresponding to a basal interlayer<br />
spacing of 25.98 A. For nanocomposite samples the mentioned<br />
peak has been shifted to lower angle at 2 =2.59 (equals to<br />
d 001 =34.09 A). The increase in basal spacing of layers denotes<br />
the introduction of rubber chains inside the layers of nanoclay<br />
and presentation of an intercalated structure in<br />
nanocomposites. Obviously, the increase in the amount of<br />
organoclay has not changed the location of the peak (and<br />
consequently the space between the layers) but caused the<br />
intensity of peak to be increased.<br />
As it can be seen, the optimum curing time and scorch time<br />
decreased when organoclay was increased. In fact, the existing<br />
ammonium in organoclay facilitated the vulcanization and<br />
decrease curing time[7]. The maximum and minimum torque<br />
increased with organoclay.<br />
Rebound resilience decreased when organoclay content<br />
increased. Abrasion resistance improved by addition of<br />
organoclay. This improvement was observed in all<br />
nanocomposites. When the content of organoclay increased,<br />
higher abrasion resistance was obtained and Relative volume<br />
loss decreased. Improvement in abrasion resistance is<br />
probably due to improvement in polymer chains crosslink<br />
density and decrement of the free chains. Compression set<br />
increases with organoclay, this means that permanent set<br />
decreased.<br />
In this research work, different samples of EPDM/NBR<br />
nanocomposites were prepared. XRD results showed that in all<br />
nanocomposites, rubber chains have been introduced into the<br />
organo-clay layers and extended the spaces, so that<br />
intercalated structures have been obtained. Study of curing<br />
characteristics of the samples showed that the addition of<br />
organoclays to the blends reduces optimum curing and scorch<br />
time. This is due to the formation of complexes between<br />
quaternary amine groups in organoclay and zinc salt or sulfur<br />
which accelerates the curing process. Moreover, it has been<br />
concluded that the more the amount of nano-clays, the higher<br />
the crosslink density. Finally, physical properties of the<br />
nanocomposites were measured. It has been shown that the<br />
addition of organoclay to the blends increaseds abrasion<br />
resistance and compression set of the samples and decreases<br />
their Rebound resilience. This is due to the intercalation of<br />
chains inside the layers in addition to the higher crosslink<br />
density of nanocomposites.<br />
*Corresponding author: Mohammad.Ersali@gmail.com<br />
[1] Mitchell. J. M, J Elast and Plast., 9, 329-340 (1977)<br />
[2] A. Usuki, Y. Kojima, M. Kawasumi, A. Okada, A. Fukushima, T.<br />
Kurauchi, O. Kamigaito, J Mater Res. 8 (1993) 1<strong>17</strong>9.<br />
[3] G. Choudalakis and A.D. Gotsis, Eur. Polym. J. 45 (2009) 967-984.<br />
[4] A.B. Morgan, Polym. Adv. Technol. <strong>17</strong> (2006) 206-2<strong>17</strong>.<br />
[5] Y.W. Chang, Yang, Y., Ryu, S. and Nah, C. Polymer International, 51(4)<br />
(2002) 319 324.<br />
[6] W. G. Hwang, K. H. Wei, C.M. Wu, Polymer 45 (2004) 5729 5734.<br />
[7] M. Arroyo, M.A. Lopez-Manchado, B. Herrero, Polymer. 44 (2003) 2447.<br />
6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 712