30.10.2014 Views

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P<br />

P Institute<br />

P<br />

P Department<br />

<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />

Theme F686 - N1123<br />

Investigation of Natural Vibration Frequency of Graphene Sheet<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1,2<br />

Arman FathizadehP P, Masoumeh OzmaianP Pand UReza NaghdabadiUP<br />

P*<br />

1<br />

for NanoScience and Technology, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran<br />

of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran<br />

2<br />

Abstract- In this study, the vibration analysis of SLGs using molecular dynamic (MD) simulation as well as beam theory is reported for different<br />

dimensions. Using these results, parameters that affect the answers obtained by continuum theory can be modified for more accurate results and<br />

lower computational cost.<br />

In recent years, graphene sheets have attracted lots of<br />

interests because of their unique properties. It could be one of<br />

the prominent materials for the nanoelectronic devices in the<br />

future. But still limited work has been done on studying the<br />

mechanics of graphene sheets.<br />

Recently, some numerical and analytical models have been<br />

proposed for the study of vibrational behavior of single and<br />

multilayer graphene sheets (MLGS) [1-3]. Behfar and<br />

Naghdabadi investigated the vibration behavior of MLGS<br />

embedded in an elastic medium [1]. Kitipornchai et al. carried<br />

out an analysis based on a continuum-plate model for MLGSs<br />

by considering the Van der Waals force between the plates [2].<br />

Sakhaeepour et al. calculated fundamental frequencies of<br />

single layer graphene sheet (SLGS) using molecular<br />

mechanics method [3].<br />

Modeling in this paper is carried out by two methods,<br />

continuum theory and MD simulation. Consider a SLGS<br />

doubly clamped in two ends. The sheet is of length L, width is<br />

w, thickness t, density and the Young’s modulus E. The<br />

fundamental frequency according to the Euler-Bernoulli beam<br />

theory is given by [4]<br />

(1)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

L <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lwt<br />

<br />

1/2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

At E A T<br />

0.57<br />

2 2<br />

where A is 1.03 for doubly clamped beam and T is the tension<br />

in the graphene sheet. The thickness is taken to be 0.34 nm<br />

(Van der Waals radius for carbon atoms), the density is 2250<br />

3<br />

kg/mP Pand the Young modulus is 1.02 TPa.<br />

1/2<br />

the system of atoms to vibrate in the first mode. Then with a<br />

Fourier analysis on variation of position of atoms or potential<br />

energy of the system with time, corresponding frequency of<br />

the system can be obtained.<br />

In order to investigate the fundamental frequency of SLGS,<br />

results are obtained for different dimensions by MD<br />

simulation as well as beam theory. As it can be seen in table 1,<br />

by increasing the aspect ratios of the graphene sheets, the<br />

results obtained by the beam theory get nearer to the MD's.<br />

There are many adjustable parameters which can affect the<br />

results of continuum model. The most important parameters<br />

are the parameter A, thickness and Young modulus of the<br />

equivalent beam (t, E), and mass distribution in the continuum<br />

model. A has a significant effect on the fundamental<br />

frequency. Effect of (t, E) is also important and their values<br />

for graphene are still under discussion. The mass distribution<br />

shows a little effect on frequency, especially for bigger sizes<br />

in which atomic spacing is negligible relative to sheet size.<br />

Present study may be used as a new method of adjusting these<br />

parameters for graphene to achieve more accurate results with<br />

continuum models.<br />

Table 1. Comparison of the fundamental frequency obtained using<br />

MD simulation and continuum beam theory.<br />

Dimensions<br />

(GHz)<br />

Length(nm) L/W MD Beam theory<br />

8.98 2.18 395.78 265.78<br />

12.32 6.22 185.42 225.15<br />

24.47 12.36 94.21 110.05<br />

35.54 <strong>17</strong>.95 56.07 48.89<br />

Figure 1. Molecular dynamics method used for calculating first<br />

natural frequency of grapheme sheets. This figure shows a vibrating<br />

graphene sheet with aspect ratio of 6.22 schematically.<br />

The molecular dynamics simulation is performed for 4<br />

different aspect ratios ranging from 1000 to 3000 atoms.<br />

These simulations are done with LAMMPS software [5] and<br />

using well-known REBO interaction potential which has been<br />

shown to be the most accurate one for study of mechanical<br />

properties of carbon nanostructures [6]. In order to model the<br />

doubly clamped boundary condition, two rows of atoms in the<br />

SLGS are fixed in two ends while the other sides are free. All<br />

of the atoms in the sheet are placed in such a way that they are<br />

initially at the position at the first mode shape of the sheet<br />

with velocity equal to zero. Then in a NVE ensemble, we let<br />

*Corresponding author: naghdabd@sharif.edu<br />

[1] K. Behfar, R. Naghdabadi, Comp. Sci. Tech., 65, 1159–1164<br />

(2005).<br />

[2] S. Kitipornchai, X. Q. He, K. M. Liew, Phys. Rev. B, 72, 075443<br />

(2005).<br />

[3] A. Sakhaee-Pour, M.T. Ahmadian and R.<br />

Naghdabadi,vNanotechnology, 19, 085702 (2008).<br />

[4] S. Timoshenko and D. H. Young, W. Weaver, New York, 425–<br />

427 (1974).<br />

[5] LAMMPS, An open source code for molecular dynamics<br />

simulation, HThttp://lammps.sandia.gov/TH.<br />

[6] D. Brenner, et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter.,14, 783–802<br />

(2002).<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 732

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!