30.10.2014 Views

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P<br />

P<br />

<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />

Theme F686 - N1123<br />

The Effect of Nanometer Size Mica Fillers on Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

UAysel Ersoy YilmazUP P*, Ayten KuntmanP Pand Bulent AydemirP<br />

1<br />

PDepartment of Electrical-Electronics Eng, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34380, Turkey<br />

2<br />

PTubitak UME, National Metrology Institute, Gebze, Kocaeli 41470, Turkey<br />

Abstract-In this study mechanical properties of nanometer size mica added polyurethanes were investigated experimentally. At first mica<br />

particles at 1 nanometer size were prepared, and then polyurethane samples with different nanometer size mica concentrations were prepared.<br />

Except 10 % mica filler concentrations the resulting nano composites compressive strength is increased.<br />

Today in many engineering applications, more than one<br />

class of materials is used together. At this point additives and<br />

fillers gain extra importance due to their significant impact on<br />

electrical, thermal, mechanical and environmental properties<br />

of the resulting composite. Polyurethanes have a wide rage of<br />

applications including coatings, adhesives, fibers, thermal<br />

insulator, electrical insulators, etc. However they have some<br />

disadvantages such as low mechanical strength, low thermal<br />

stability, low electrical properties, etc. During the last decade<br />

several studies has been done to improve these properties<br />

using nano size particles [1-5].<br />

In this study polyurethane nano composite with various mica<br />

concentrations is studied. To investigate the change in<br />

mechanical properties compressive strength tests were done<br />

according to the ASTM D1621-04a standard.<br />

In this study micas were modified with aminolauric acid and<br />

the preparation procedure was briefly given. Biotite<br />

(KMg2.5Fe2+0.5AlSi3O10(OH)1.75F0.25 ) which has a<br />

density of 2,9 g/cm3 is used as mica filler. To a suspension of<br />

aminolauric acid (8.61 g, 40 mmol) in 1,000 ml distilled<br />

water, concentrated HCl (4.<strong>17</strong> g, 40 mmol) was added. The<br />

mixture was stirred at 80 C until getting a clear solution<br />

indicating the formation of ammonium salt. To this solution, a<br />

suspension of 20 g of mica in 1,000 ml of distilled water was<br />

added with mechanical stirring at 80 C. The stirring was<br />

continued over night. The resulted white precipitate was<br />

collected by suction filtration. The precipitate was suspended<br />

in hot distilled water with mechanical stirring for 1 h to<br />

remove the adsorbed salts. This process was repeated several<br />

times until no chloride ions were detected in the filtrate when<br />

adding 0.1 M AgNO3. The precipitate was dried in a vented<br />

oven at 60 oC for 3 days and then at 80 oC under 0.01 atm.<br />

vacuum for 24 h.<br />

All the polyurethane nano composite samples were prepared<br />

under the same laboratory conditions. The desired weights of<br />

polyurethane, mica and %0.01 Di butyltin dilaurate catalyst<br />

was mixed for 5 minutes. Then the mixture was heated to 100<br />

oC and 25% polymeric (methylenediphenylene diisocyanate)<br />

MDI was added. The new blend was poured into the mould<br />

and pressed for 10 minutes with the help of clamps. Mould<br />

was placed in a degasser under high vacuum to remove any air<br />

and potentially water vapor from the system. 24 h later the<br />

mould was opened and the samples were cut in the dimensions<br />

of 1mm by 50mm by 50mm. The highest content of mica in<br />

polyurethane samples was limited to 10 % by weight for nano<br />

fillers due to dispersion and processing problems.<br />

The mechanical tests to determine compressive strength were<br />

carried out on samples prepared according to the ASTM<br />

D1621-04a standard. The experiments were carried out with a<br />

Zwick tensile test machine at National Metrology Institute in<br />

TUBITAK. For the compressive strength tests, the samples<br />

were shaped into 12.3 mm diameter, 25.4 mm long cylinders.<br />

The test parameters can be adjusted with TestXpert software.<br />

Tests were performed at a speed of 1.00 mm/min. All tests<br />

were performed at 23 C (room temperature).<br />

Table 1. Compressive strength test results for 1 nm particle size<br />

Material Type Compressive Strength (GPa)<br />

Pure PU 9,056<br />

PU+%1 11,426<br />

PU+%3 11,600<br />

PU+%5 9,541<br />

PU+%10 7,816<br />

The preparation of PU nanocomposite foams were described<br />

in this study. Clay dispersion is affect by chemical process.<br />

With the inclusion of 3% micas, nanocomposite show a<br />

smaller cell size than pure polyurethane samples. Depending<br />

on the chemical structure of polyurethane, as high as 28%<br />

increase in compressive strength were observed in PU-mica<br />

nanocomposite. However increasing the filler content to 10%<br />

mica concentration opposite effect was observed in PU<br />

nanocomposite 13.6% decrease in compressive strength were<br />

observed. Preparation of polyurethane nanocomposite is a<br />

complicated process where many factors could effect bubble<br />

nucleation and bubble growth and in turn the compressive<br />

strength. For applications in electrical insulators, compressive<br />

strength is a very important property to calculate the mass of<br />

cover material upon the bare cable conductor. According to<br />

the results from this study cell size in polyurethane nano<br />

composite is decreased and compressive strength is<br />

remarkably increased at 3% mica addition. However detailed<br />

mechanism on how nano size mica particles affect mechanical<br />

properties of polyurethanes needs further investigation.<br />

*Corresponding author: aersoy@istanbul.edu.tr<br />

[1] R. A. C. Altafim, C. R. Murakami, S. C. Neto, L. C. R. Araújo,<br />

G. O. Chierice, “The Effects of Fillers on Polyurethane Resin-based<br />

Electrical Insulators”, Materials Research, Vol 6, No 2, pp. 187-191,<br />

2003.<br />

[2] X. Cao, L. J. Lee, T. Widya, C. Macosko, “Polyurethane/clay<br />

nanocomposites foams: processing, structure and properties”,<br />

Polymer , Vol. 46, pp.775-783, 2005.<br />

[3] J.H. Chang, Y. U. An, “Nanocomposites of Polyurethane with<br />

Various Organoclays: Thermomechanical Properties, Morphology,<br />

and Gas Permeability”, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer<br />

Physics, Vol. 40, pp. 670–677, 2002 .<br />

[4] F. Saint-Michel, L. Chazeau, J.-Y. Cavaille, “Mechanical<br />

properties of high density polyurethane foams: II Effect of the filler<br />

size”, Composites Science and Technology Vol. 66, pp. 2709–2718,<br />

2006. .<br />

[5] K.J. Yao, M. Song, D.J. Hourston, D.Z. Luo, “Polymer/layered<br />

clay nanocomposites: 2 polyurethane nanocomposites”, Polymer<br />

Communication, Vol. 43, pp.10<strong>17</strong>-1020, 2002.<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 729

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!