30.10.2014 Views

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P<br />

P and<br />

P<br />

<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />

Theme F686 - N1123<br />

0BElectrical and Magnetic Properties of La<br />

0.67Ca0.33MnO3<br />

SrTiO 3 Nanocomposites<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

UShailendra Singh RajputUP P*, Leena JoshiP Sunita Keshri (Shaw)P<br />

1<br />

PDepartment of Applied Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, India<br />

AbstractA composite series<br />

, has been studied in order to investigate the influence of STO phase on<br />

structural and magneto transport properties of LCMO phase. By X ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy we find that there is no<br />

interdiffusion between the LCMO and STO phases. The EDX results show that the grains which are smaller in size and mainly distributed at<br />

the grain boundaries and on the surfaces of LCMO grains are of STO phase. Measurements of resistivity on these samples reveal that parent<br />

sample shows a distinct metal insulator transition. The series exhibits a conduction threshold at , up to which extrinsic<br />

transition temperature decreases along with an increase in extrinsic magnetoresistance; whereas above these trends of variation are<br />

reversed. The magnetic phase transitions have been studied by the temperature variation of real () component of AC susceptibility as shown<br />

below. The parent LCMO sample undergoes a PM FM transition at . After addition of STO, remains almost same.<br />

Recently extensive research in nanotechnology and<br />

nanoscience is being carried out worldwide. A<br />

nanocomposite material composed of two different<br />

nanometer-sized crystallites would have significantly<br />

higher contact area between the two compounds, and may<br />

therefore posses an enhanced magneto electric effect. One<br />

of the most serious problems in the practical application of<br />

new manganite colossal magnetoresistance (CMR)<br />

materials remains to be their in sufficient magnetoresistive<br />

(MR) response at room temperature in weak magnetic<br />

fields, used in most of the potentially interesting devices<br />

[1]. Much effort has been made to enhance the properties<br />

of these materials, such as synthesizing CMR–insulator<br />

composites. These extrinsic effects rely on the existence of<br />

an insulating tunneling barrier separating the<br />

ferromagnetic grains. Such attempts include LCMO BTO<br />

[2], LCSMO CoFeR2ROR4R [3] etc and so on. Most of such<br />

results show enhancement in MR. Our previous work has<br />

shown that making LSMO-based composite provides an<br />

efficient way to enhance and control electrical transport<br />

and MR [4]. In present report the magnetic and electric<br />

properties of a series of CMR ferroelectric (FE)<br />

composites have been studied.<br />

A composite series where<br />

= 0.0, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40 samples were<br />

prepared in two steps. In this process firstly single phase<br />

LCMO was prepared by pyrophoric method. It was then<br />

mixed with fine powder of STO (Alfa Aesar, 99.99%) in<br />

required ratio and pressed into pellets. The pellets were<br />

Resistivity(cm)<br />

x=0.40<br />

x=0.30<br />

x=0.20<br />

x=0.10<br />

x=0.0<br />

50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

T (K)<br />

Figure 1. Temperature variation of resistivity for composite<br />

finally sintered at 900 C in air for 2 hr, and then slowly<br />

furnace cooled to room temperature..<br />

The XRD and SEM analysis exhibits that the composites<br />

consist of two phases: one is LCMO perovskite phase; the<br />

other is STO phase, which clearly indicates the<br />

coexistence of LCMO and STO phases. The variation of<br />

resistivity as a function of temperature in zero fields for all<br />

composites in the temperature range 10–300K is shown in<br />

Figure 1. The parent LCMO sample shows metal- insulator<br />

(M-I) transition at a temperature<br />

followed by<br />

a broad hump. In all grown composites of this series, a<br />

small peak corresponding to M-I transition of parent<br />

LCMO occurs at 240K. With the increase of STO content<br />

upto to , decreases and resistivity () at<br />

increases as shown in Figure. But for , a reverse<br />

trend is observed, i. e. again increases with a small<br />

decrease in resistivity. The magnetic phase transitions have<br />

been studied by the temperature variation of real ()<br />

component of AC susceptibility. The LCMO sample<br />

undergoes a PM-FM transition at Tc ~270K. After addition<br />

(Arbitrary unit)<br />

x=0.40<br />

x=0.30<br />

x=0.20<br />

x=0.10<br />

x=0.0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

T (K)<br />

Figure 2. Real part of AC susceptibility for all samples<br />

of BTO, Tc remains almost same indicating that<br />

stoichiometry of LCMO phase within the grains remains<br />

essentially unchanged. Since STO is nonmagnetic in the<br />

measured temperature range, the ferromagnetic order of<br />

the composites comes up only from LCMO.<br />

In summery a nanocomposites series has been prepared<br />

by pyrophoric method. From XRD, and SEM results the<br />

coexistence of both the phases has been confirmed. The<br />

parent sample shows a distinct transition at .<br />

From resistivity data it is concluded that for this series,<br />

conduction threshold occurs at STO content. S.<br />

Keshri gratefully acknowledges Department of Science<br />

and Technology (DST), India for financial assistance. L.<br />

Joshi and S. S. Rajput gratefully acknowledge Council of<br />

Scientific and Industrial Research and DST, India for<br />

providing fellowship, respectively.<br />

* Corresponding author: HTShailendra.phy@gmail.comT<br />

[1] Daughton, J-M., 1999. GMR application, J. Magn. Magn. Mater,<br />

192: 334-342.<br />

[2] Keshri, S., Joshi, L., Rout, S-K., 2009. Influence of BTO phase on<br />

structural, magnetic and electrical properties of LCMO, J. of<br />

Alloys and Compd., 485: 501-506.<br />

[3] Xiong, C-S., et al., 2009. Electrical properties and magnetoelectric<br />

effect measurement in La0R.7RCaR0.2RSrR0.1RMnOR3R/xCoFeR2ROR4R<br />

composites, J. of Alloys and Compd. 474: 316-320.<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 750

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!