30.10.2014 Views

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />

Humidity Sensing Investigation of ZnO Nanostructures Using QCM Technique<br />

Nurdan Asar 1 , Nesli Tekguzel Yagmurcukardes 2 , Ayse Erol 1 , Salih Okur 2 , M. Cetin Arikan 1<br />

1 Istanbul University Faculty of Science Physics Department 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

2 Izmir Institute of Technology 35430 Urla, Izmir, Turkey<br />

Theme F686 - N1123<br />

Abstract: ZnO nanostructures were synthesized via chemical sol-gel method in two different morphologies. Their humidity sensing properties were investigated by<br />

using Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) technique. It was found that the frequency shift of the ZnO nanostructures coated on QCM increases with increasing relative<br />

humidity between 33-77 % at room temperature. The results show that humidity sensing properties are strongly dependent on morphology of the nanostructures.<br />

ZnO is one of the most important promising metal oxide<br />

semiconductors for gas/vapour/humidity sensing applications and has<br />

pronounced sensitivity to gases such as NH 3 , NO 2 , CO, H 2 , ethanol<br />

and humidity [1-4]. It has been observed that ZnO nanostructures<br />

synthesized in different morphologies compared with its thin film or<br />

bulk counterparts have much more sensitivity due to their high<br />

surface to volume ratio and more chemically active centers [5].<br />

In this study we synthesized ZnO nanostructures by using chemical<br />

sol-gel method. Crystal structure and morphology of ZnO<br />

nanostructures synthesized in different experimental conditions were<br />

characterized by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron<br />

Microscopy (SEM).<br />

(a)<br />

(a)<br />

Samples S2 and S3 were synthesized with different molarities of Zn +2<br />

and OH - solutions. Samples dried in ambient air for 24 hours. As seen<br />

from the Figures 1 (a) and (b), the morphology of S2 is nanoparticle<br />

while the morphology of S3 is nanowire and both structures have<br />

diameter as ~ 20 nm. XRD patterns showed that both samples are<br />

crystallized in hexagonal wurtzite structure.<br />

Humidity sensing investigations of ZnO nanostructures were<br />

carried out using Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) technique.<br />

Samples dispersed in ethanol were dropped on quartz crystal and<br />

exposed to various saturated salt solutions. The frequency responses<br />

of the ZnO nanostructure sensors to relative humidity changing<br />

between 33-77% RH were measured at room temperature. Relative<br />

humidity was recorded by commercial sensor simultaneously.<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 2: Frequency responses of S2 and S3 sensors under 33 – 77% relative humidity<br />

exposure at room temperature.<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

Figure 2 shows response and recovery curves of the sensors. When<br />

%RH was decreased from 77 to 33%, frequencies of the sensors were<br />

backshifted to their initial values. In comparison with nanowires,<br />

nanoparticles showed larger frequency shift.<br />

The experimental results demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles are<br />

more sensitive to humidity changes compared to nanowires due to<br />

having high surface to volume ratio and much more chemically active<br />

centers.<br />

This work was supported by Scientific Research Projects<br />

Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project number 4907.<br />

Figure 1: (a-b) SEM images and (c-d) XRD patterns of samples S2 and S3, respectively.<br />

[1] Hongsith N., Choopun S., Mangkorntong P.,Mangkorntong N., 2005. CMU. J.<br />

Special issue on nanotechnology. vol. 4 No. 1: 15-20.<br />

[2] Sadek A. Z., Choopun S., Wlodarski W., Ippolito S. J., Kalantar Zadeh K., 2007.<br />

IEEE Sensors Journal. Vol. 7, No. 6.<br />

[3] Krishnakumar T., Jayaprakash R., Pinna N., Donato N., Bonavita A., Micali G. and<br />

Neri G., 2009. Sensors & Actuators: B. 143, 198.<br />

[4] Qi Q., Zhang T., Yu Q., Wang R., Zeng Y., Liu L., Yang H., 2008. Sensors and<br />

Actuators B: Chemical. 638-643.<br />

[5] Hongsith N., Viriyaworasakul C., Mangkorntong P. , Mangkorntong N. , Choopun<br />

S., 2008 Ceramics International 34: 823–826.<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 698

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!