Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />
Humidity Sensing Investigation of ZnO Nanostructures Using QCM Technique<br />
Nurdan Asar 1 , Nesli Tekguzel Yagmurcukardes 2 , Ayse Erol 1 , Salih Okur 2 , M. Cetin Arikan 1<br />
1 Istanbul University Faculty of Science Physics Department 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
2 Izmir Institute of Technology 35430 Urla, Izmir, Turkey<br />
Theme F686 - N1123<br />
Abstract: ZnO nanostructures were synthesized via chemical sol-gel method in two different morphologies. Their humidity sensing properties were investigated by<br />
using Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) technique. It was found that the frequency shift of the ZnO nanostructures coated on QCM increases with increasing relative<br />
humidity between 33-77 % at room temperature. The results show that humidity sensing properties are strongly dependent on morphology of the nanostructures.<br />
ZnO is one of the most important promising metal oxide<br />
semiconductors for gas/vapour/humidity sensing applications and has<br />
pronounced sensitivity to gases such as NH 3 , NO 2 , CO, H 2 , ethanol<br />
and humidity [1-4]. It has been observed that ZnO nanostructures<br />
synthesized in different morphologies compared with its thin film or<br />
bulk counterparts have much more sensitivity due to their high<br />
surface to volume ratio and more chemically active centers [5].<br />
In this study we synthesized ZnO nanostructures by using chemical<br />
sol-gel method. Crystal structure and morphology of ZnO<br />
nanostructures synthesized in different experimental conditions were<br />
characterized by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron<br />
Microscopy (SEM).<br />
(a)<br />
(a)<br />
Samples S2 and S3 were synthesized with different molarities of Zn +2<br />
and OH - solutions. Samples dried in ambient air for 24 hours. As seen<br />
from the Figures 1 (a) and (b), the morphology of S2 is nanoparticle<br />
while the morphology of S3 is nanowire and both structures have<br />
diameter as ~ 20 nm. XRD patterns showed that both samples are<br />
crystallized in hexagonal wurtzite structure.<br />
Humidity sensing investigations of ZnO nanostructures were<br />
carried out using Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) technique.<br />
Samples dispersed in ethanol were dropped on quartz crystal and<br />
exposed to various saturated salt solutions. The frequency responses<br />
of the ZnO nanostructure sensors to relative humidity changing<br />
between 33-77% RH were measured at room temperature. Relative<br />
humidity was recorded by commercial sensor simultaneously.<br />
(b)<br />
Figure 2: Frequency responses of S2 and S3 sensors under 33 – 77% relative humidity<br />
exposure at room temperature.<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
Figure 2 shows response and recovery curves of the sensors. When<br />
%RH was decreased from 77 to 33%, frequencies of the sensors were<br />
backshifted to their initial values. In comparison with nanowires,<br />
nanoparticles showed larger frequency shift.<br />
The experimental results demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles are<br />
more sensitive to humidity changes compared to nanowires due to<br />
having high surface to volume ratio and much more chemically active<br />
centers.<br />
This work was supported by Scientific Research Projects<br />
Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project number 4907.<br />
Figure 1: (a-b) SEM images and (c-d) XRD patterns of samples S2 and S3, respectively.<br />
[1] Hongsith N., Choopun S., Mangkorntong P.,Mangkorntong N., 2005. CMU. J.<br />
Special issue on nanotechnology. vol. 4 No. 1: 15-20.<br />
[2] Sadek A. Z., Choopun S., Wlodarski W., Ippolito S. J., Kalantar Zadeh K., 2007.<br />
IEEE Sensors Journal. Vol. 7, No. 6.<br />
[3] Krishnakumar T., Jayaprakash R., Pinna N., Donato N., Bonavita A., Micali G. and<br />
Neri G., 2009. Sensors & Actuators: B. 143, 198.<br />
[4] Qi Q., Zhang T., Yu Q., Wang R., Zeng Y., Liu L., Yang H., 2008. Sensors and<br />
Actuators B: Chemical. 638-643.<br />
[5] Hongsith N., Viriyaworasakul C., Mangkorntong P. , Mangkorntong N. , Choopun<br />
S., 2008 Ceramics International 34: 823–826.<br />
6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 698