Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />
Theme F686 - N1123<br />
Synthesis And Properties Of Clay-Cellulose-Polyester Nano-Hybrid materials<br />
Erkan Bahçe 1 , Süleyman Köytepe 2 and Turgay Seçkin 2 *<br />
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Inonu, Malatya, TR Türkiye 44280<br />
2 Department of Chemistry, University of Inonu, Malatya, TR Türkiye 44280<br />
Abstract-Polyester in which cellulose and clay reinforced particles are uniformly distributed are prepared. Novel hybrid polyester/cellulose/clay<br />
composites are structurally elucidated by means of FTIR, SEM, XRD and thermal analytical techniques. The selected polymer for the<br />
composites preparation was commercial polyester. The composites were prepared using a mixer. The polyester, cellulose and the various<br />
proportions of clay were mixed at 90 ºC during selected time considered adequate for a homogeneous mixture. The extracted composites were<br />
then dried using the vacuum oven for 24 hours.<br />
Recent advances in polymer–clay nanocomposites due to the<br />
pioneering work of researchers at Toyota on nylon-6/clay<br />
nanocomposites have demonstrated an improvement in both<br />
physical and mechanical properties [1]. Because of the<br />
nanoscale structure, polymer–clay nanocomposites possess<br />
unique properties which include an improvement in<br />
mechanical (modulus, strength, toughness), thermal (thermal<br />
stability, decomposition, flammability, coefficient of thermal<br />
expansion), and physical (permeability, optical, dielectric,<br />
shrinkage) properties [2]. Nanocomposites have been<br />
demonstrated with many polymers of different polarities<br />
including polystyrene, polycaprolactone, poly(ethylene oxide),<br />
poly(butylene terephthalate), polymethylmethacrylate,<br />
polyamide, polyimide, polyester, polyether, epoxy,<br />
polysiloxane, and polyurethane. Similarly, cellulose and other<br />
natural fibres are increasingly being used as reinforcements<br />
for enhancing the strength and fracture resistance of polymeric<br />
matrices because of their low density, low cost, renewability<br />
and recyclability as well as excellent mechanical<br />
characteristics that include flexibility, high specific strength<br />
and high specific modulus [3]. These unique properties are<br />
particularly desirable in applications as composite materials<br />
for automobiles, armour, sports, and marine industries.<br />
Natural fibers can be produced in many types of reinforcement<br />
composites, such as continuous and discontinuous<br />
unidirectional fibers, random orientation of fibers, etc. By<br />
taking the advantages from those types of reinforced<br />
composites such as produced good properties and reduced the<br />
fabrication cost, they had been used in the development of<br />
automotive, packaging and building materials. They can be<br />
spun into filaments, thread or rope. They can be used as a<br />
component of composite materials.<br />
Natural fibers are now emerging as viable alternatives to<br />
glass fibers either alone or combined in composite materials<br />
for various applications. The advantages of natural fibers over<br />
synthetic or man-made fibers such as glass are their relatively<br />
high stiffness, a desirable property in composites, low density,<br />
recyclable, biodegradable, renewable raw materials, and their<br />
relatively low cost. Besides, natural fibers are expected to give<br />
less health problems for the people producing the composites.<br />
Natural fibers do not cause skin irritations and they are not<br />
suspected of causing lung cancer [4]. The disadvantages are<br />
their relatively high moisture sensitivity and their relatively<br />
high variability of diameter and length. The abundance of<br />
natural fibers combined with the ease of their processability is<br />
an attractive feature, which makes it a covetable substitute for<br />
synthetic fibers that are potentially toxic [5].<br />
Figure 1. The sutructure of the cellulose (reference should be defined<br />
as the square paratheses) [6].<br />
Paint on ships, bridges, military vehicles and airplanes must<br />
be removed from the surfaces in order to allow detail surface<br />
in sections, to perform other works and repair operations, and<br />
to keep the weight down to acceptable levels. In the past,<br />
chemical have been used for removing paints. Due to the<br />
development of tougher paint systems to meet the increasing<br />
demands of the industry, more aggressive chemical paint<br />
strippers have been developed. These aggressive paint<br />
strippers are very efficient in doing the job, but they are<br />
hazardous and toxic to the environment and generate large<br />
amounts of hazardous waste. The present invention is a<br />
method of stripping paint from the painted surface comprising<br />
the step of cleaning the painted surface with a media<br />
(polyester) comprising hard shell pit particles sized between<br />
12 mesh and 50 mesh.<br />
In this study, the selected polymer for the composites<br />
preparation was commercial polyester, the composites were<br />
prepared using a mixer. The polyester, cellulose and the<br />
various proportions of clay were mixed at 90 ºC during<br />
selected time considered adequate for a homogeneous mixture.<br />
The extracted composites were then dried using the vacuum<br />
oven for 24 hours.<br />
It is an advantage of the present invention that the paint<br />
stripping method generates less toxic waste than most prior art<br />
methods. It is another advantage of the present invention that<br />
the method is both effective and efficient. Other advantages,<br />
features, and objects of the present invention will become<br />
apparent after one of skill in the art has reviewed the<br />
specification and claims.<br />
*Corresponding author: 0Htseckin@inonu.edu.tr<br />
[1] L. An, , H.M.Chan, , N.P. Padture, B.R. Lawn, J. Mater. Res. 11,<br />
204 (1996)<br />
[2] A.K. Bledzki, J. Gassan, Prog. Polym. Sci., 24, 221 (1999)<br />
[3] X. Fu, S. Qutubuddin, Mater. Lett. 42, 12 (2000)<br />
[4] I. Isik, U. Yilmazer, G. Bayram, Polymer, 44, 6371 (2003)<br />
[5] B.Z. Jang, Y.K. Lieu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 30, 3925 (1985)<br />
[6] R. Young, Cellulose structure modification and hydrolysis. New<br />
York: Wiley (1986).<br />
6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 731