30.10.2014 Views

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

Third Day Poster Session, 17 June 2010 - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Poster</strong> <strong>Session</strong>, Thursday, <strong>June</strong> <strong>17</strong><br />

Theme F686 - N1123<br />

Synthesis And Properties Of Clay-Cellulose-Polyester Nano-Hybrid materials<br />

Erkan Bahçe 1 , Süleyman Köytepe 2 and Turgay Seçkin 2 *<br />

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Inonu, Malatya, TR Türkiye 44280<br />

2 Department of Chemistry, University of Inonu, Malatya, TR Türkiye 44280<br />

Abstract-Polyester in which cellulose and clay reinforced particles are uniformly distributed are prepared. Novel hybrid polyester/cellulose/clay<br />

composites are structurally elucidated by means of FTIR, SEM, XRD and thermal analytical techniques. The selected polymer for the<br />

composites preparation was commercial polyester. The composites were prepared using a mixer. The polyester, cellulose and the various<br />

proportions of clay were mixed at 90 ºC during selected time considered adequate for a homogeneous mixture. The extracted composites were<br />

then dried using the vacuum oven for 24 hours.<br />

Recent advances in polymer–clay nanocomposites due to the<br />

pioneering work of researchers at Toyota on nylon-6/clay<br />

nanocomposites have demonstrated an improvement in both<br />

physical and mechanical properties [1]. Because of the<br />

nanoscale structure, polymer–clay nanocomposites possess<br />

unique properties which include an improvement in<br />

mechanical (modulus, strength, toughness), thermal (thermal<br />

stability, decomposition, flammability, coefficient of thermal<br />

expansion), and physical (permeability, optical, dielectric,<br />

shrinkage) properties [2]. Nanocomposites have been<br />

demonstrated with many polymers of different polarities<br />

including polystyrene, polycaprolactone, poly(ethylene oxide),<br />

poly(butylene terephthalate), polymethylmethacrylate,<br />

polyamide, polyimide, polyester, polyether, epoxy,<br />

polysiloxane, and polyurethane. Similarly, cellulose and other<br />

natural fibres are increasingly being used as reinforcements<br />

for enhancing the strength and fracture resistance of polymeric<br />

matrices because of their low density, low cost, renewability<br />

and recyclability as well as excellent mechanical<br />

characteristics that include flexibility, high specific strength<br />

and high specific modulus [3]. These unique properties are<br />

particularly desirable in applications as composite materials<br />

for automobiles, armour, sports, and marine industries.<br />

Natural fibers can be produced in many types of reinforcement<br />

composites, such as continuous and discontinuous<br />

unidirectional fibers, random orientation of fibers, etc. By<br />

taking the advantages from those types of reinforced<br />

composites such as produced good properties and reduced the<br />

fabrication cost, they had been used in the development of<br />

automotive, packaging and building materials. They can be<br />

spun into filaments, thread or rope. They can be used as a<br />

component of composite materials.<br />

Natural fibers are now emerging as viable alternatives to<br />

glass fibers either alone or combined in composite materials<br />

for various applications. The advantages of natural fibers over<br />

synthetic or man-made fibers such as glass are their relatively<br />

high stiffness, a desirable property in composites, low density,<br />

recyclable, biodegradable, renewable raw materials, and their<br />

relatively low cost. Besides, natural fibers are expected to give<br />

less health problems for the people producing the composites.<br />

Natural fibers do not cause skin irritations and they are not<br />

suspected of causing lung cancer [4]. The disadvantages are<br />

their relatively high moisture sensitivity and their relatively<br />

high variability of diameter and length. The abundance of<br />

natural fibers combined with the ease of their processability is<br />

an attractive feature, which makes it a covetable substitute for<br />

synthetic fibers that are potentially toxic [5].<br />

Figure 1. The sutructure of the cellulose (reference should be defined<br />

as the square paratheses) [6].<br />

Paint on ships, bridges, military vehicles and airplanes must<br />

be removed from the surfaces in order to allow detail surface<br />

in sections, to perform other works and repair operations, and<br />

to keep the weight down to acceptable levels. In the past,<br />

chemical have been used for removing paints. Due to the<br />

development of tougher paint systems to meet the increasing<br />

demands of the industry, more aggressive chemical paint<br />

strippers have been developed. These aggressive paint<br />

strippers are very efficient in doing the job, but they are<br />

hazardous and toxic to the environment and generate large<br />

amounts of hazardous waste. The present invention is a<br />

method of stripping paint from the painted surface comprising<br />

the step of cleaning the painted surface with a media<br />

(polyester) comprising hard shell pit particles sized between<br />

12 mesh and 50 mesh.<br />

In this study, the selected polymer for the composites<br />

preparation was commercial polyester, the composites were<br />

prepared using a mixer. The polyester, cellulose and the<br />

various proportions of clay were mixed at 90 ºC during<br />

selected time considered adequate for a homogeneous mixture.<br />

The extracted composites were then dried using the vacuum<br />

oven for 24 hours.<br />

It is an advantage of the present invention that the paint<br />

stripping method generates less toxic waste than most prior art<br />

methods. It is another advantage of the present invention that<br />

the method is both effective and efficient. Other advantages,<br />

features, and objects of the present invention will become<br />

apparent after one of skill in the art has reviewed the<br />

specification and claims.<br />

*Corresponding author: 0Htseckin@inonu.edu.tr<br />

[1] L. An, , H.M.Chan, , N.P. Padture, B.R. Lawn, J. Mater. Res. 11,<br />

204 (1996)<br />

[2] A.K. Bledzki, J. Gassan, Prog. Polym. Sci., 24, 221 (1999)<br />

[3] X. Fu, S. Qutubuddin, Mater. Lett. 42, 12 (2000)<br />

[4] I. Isik, U. Yilmazer, G. Bayram, Polymer, 44, 6371 (2003)<br />

[5] B.Z. Jang, Y.K. Lieu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 30, 3925 (1985)<br />

[6] R. Young, Cellulose structure modification and hydrolysis. New<br />

York: Wiley (1986).<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, <strong>2010</strong> 731

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!