03.11.2014 Views

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4<br />

DELIVERING QUALITY SERVICES<br />

performing staff may only be promoted once or twice over the course of their career.<br />

Other forms of recognition, such as annual bonuses for strong contributions and<br />

awards for specific good work, do not fill this “acknowledgment gap.” Annual<br />

salary increases are linked to performance, but the difference in salary adjustment<br />

between a typical performer and the best performer amounts to as little as two or<br />

three percentage points, minimizing its efficacy as an incentive. Team awards for<br />

specific pieces of good work are distributed on criteria aligned with str<strong>at</strong>egic<br />

objectives—a focus on development results, collabor<strong>at</strong>ion, responsiveness, and<br />

innov<strong>at</strong>ion—but these awards are rare and inadequ<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

BEHAVIORS OF STAFF IN RESPONSE TO FORMAL AND INFORMAL INCENTIVES<br />

4.41 Staff receive substantial encouragement to meet country-specific needs and<br />

lending targets from their managers, but less encouragement to work across<br />

sectors or use expertise across organiz<strong>at</strong>ional boundaries. A primary informal<br />

incentive is direct encouragement from managers. Over three-fifths of anchor and<br />

sector unit staff received substantial or gre<strong>at</strong>er encouragement from managers to<br />

give priority to meeting lending targets, and a majority received such<br />

encouragement to adapt knowledge to country needs, as shown in Table 4.1. By<br />

contrast, they received substantially less encouragement to adopt “m<strong>at</strong>rix<br />

behaviors,” such as collabor<strong>at</strong>ing across sectors and mobilizing Bank-wide expertise.<br />

Country unit staff believe sector unit staff have even less incentive to engage in these<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix behaviors. As a senior sector unit staff member in a Region summarized, “the<br />

m<strong>at</strong>rix environment has so many mixed messages and incentives, th<strong>at</strong> the only thing<br />

th<strong>at</strong> everyone can agree on is the importance of the ‘deliveries’ of lending products.”<br />

Table 4.1. Percentage of Anchor and sector Staff Indic<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>The</strong>y Received Substantial<br />

Encouragement to Carry Out the Following Behaviors<br />

Encouragement to:<br />

From sector<br />

management<br />

Collabor<strong>at</strong>e<br />

across<br />

sectors<br />

Mobilize<br />

Bank-wide<br />

expertise<br />

Adapt<br />

knowledge to<br />

country<br />

needs<br />

Prioritize<br />

lending<br />

targets<br />

Focus<br />

on<br />

results<br />

Use M&E<br />

to<br />

improve<br />

quality<br />

40 41 54 61 53 36<br />

From country<br />

management<br />

35 25 52 67 41 27<br />

Country staff view 16 18 25 48 32 14<br />

of sector staff<br />

incentives<br />

Source: IEG <strong>M<strong>at</strong>rix</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion Staff Survey<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!