The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...
The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...
The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 4<br />
DELIVERING QUALITY SERVICES<br />
performing staff may only be promoted once or twice over the course of their career.<br />
Other forms of recognition, such as annual bonuses for strong contributions and<br />
awards for specific good work, do not fill this “acknowledgment gap.” Annual<br />
salary increases are linked to performance, but the difference in salary adjustment<br />
between a typical performer and the best performer amounts to as little as two or<br />
three percentage points, minimizing its efficacy as an incentive. Team awards for<br />
specific pieces of good work are distributed on criteria aligned with str<strong>at</strong>egic<br />
objectives—a focus on development results, collabor<strong>at</strong>ion, responsiveness, and<br />
innov<strong>at</strong>ion—but these awards are rare and inadequ<strong>at</strong>e.<br />
BEHAVIORS OF STAFF IN RESPONSE TO FORMAL AND INFORMAL INCENTIVES<br />
4.41 Staff receive substantial encouragement to meet country-specific needs and<br />
lending targets from their managers, but less encouragement to work across<br />
sectors or use expertise across organiz<strong>at</strong>ional boundaries. A primary informal<br />
incentive is direct encouragement from managers. Over three-fifths of anchor and<br />
sector unit staff received substantial or gre<strong>at</strong>er encouragement from managers to<br />
give priority to meeting lending targets, and a majority received such<br />
encouragement to adapt knowledge to country needs, as shown in Table 4.1. By<br />
contrast, they received substantially less encouragement to adopt “m<strong>at</strong>rix<br />
behaviors,” such as collabor<strong>at</strong>ing across sectors and mobilizing Bank-wide expertise.<br />
Country unit staff believe sector unit staff have even less incentive to engage in these<br />
m<strong>at</strong>rix behaviors. As a senior sector unit staff member in a Region summarized, “the<br />
m<strong>at</strong>rix environment has so many mixed messages and incentives, th<strong>at</strong> the only thing<br />
th<strong>at</strong> everyone can agree on is the importance of the ‘deliveries’ of lending products.”<br />
Table 4.1. Percentage of Anchor and sector Staff Indic<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>The</strong>y Received Substantial<br />
Encouragement to Carry Out the Following Behaviors<br />
Encouragement to:<br />
From sector<br />
management<br />
Collabor<strong>at</strong>e<br />
across<br />
sectors<br />
Mobilize<br />
Bank-wide<br />
expertise<br />
Adapt<br />
knowledge to<br />
country<br />
needs<br />
Prioritize<br />
lending<br />
targets<br />
Focus<br />
on<br />
results<br />
Use M&E<br />
to<br />
improve<br />
quality<br />
40 41 54 61 53 36<br />
From country<br />
management<br />
35 25 52 67 41 27<br />
Country staff view 16 18 25 48 32 14<br />
of sector staff<br />
incentives<br />
Source: IEG <strong>M<strong>at</strong>rix</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion Staff Survey<br />
75