03.11.2014 Views

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

The Matrix System at Work - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5<br />

INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

merging social development with SDN r<strong>at</strong>her than with other networks, such as HDN<br />

or PREM, which have overlapping mand<strong>at</strong>es. 67<br />

5.27 <strong>The</strong> merger of the two networks was also induced in part by the possibility<br />

of cost savings, but there is little evidence th<strong>at</strong> this has occurred and organiz<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

complexity has increased. SDN <strong>at</strong>tempted to reorganize itself after the merger was<br />

announced. In the network VPU, the three infrastructure departments were merged<br />

into two departments, 68 but staff from former ESSD and urban sectors resisted a<br />

further merger. More substantial cost savings might have been realized if Sector<br />

Boards under the two previous networks were merged. However, even among the<br />

INF sectors, despite the reduction in number of departments, the number of Sector<br />

Boards remained unchanged. SDN has eight Sector Boards, 69 compared to three in<br />

HDN and four in PREM. Within the Regions, some sector units were merged but this<br />

was done unevenly across Regions and span of control increased to 47 staff per<br />

manager in SDN (Table 5.1). SDN has adapted to budget constraints by becoming<br />

even more dependent on trust funds than other network anchors.<br />

Table 5.1. Selected Indic<strong>at</strong>ors for Networks<br />

VPU FPD HDN PREM SDN<br />

Total regional and<br />

anchor staff (as of June 2011)<br />

565 904 827 2308<br />

Share of anchor staff/total staff 48% 23% 21% 30%<br />

Span of control<br />

(total staff/sector manager)<br />

28 40 34 47<br />

Scope of control<br />

(Sector Boards/Global Practices)<br />

6* 3 4 8<br />

Network Anchor Expenditures<br />

(FY10 BB + BETF actuals) (in US$ million)<br />

68 64 47 208<br />

Share of BETFs in Anchor Expenditures 39% 43% 32% 52%<br />

Source: <strong>World</strong> Bank d<strong>at</strong>abases.<br />

Note: D<strong>at</strong>a exclude financial management and procurement sector boards which fall under the OPCS Network.<br />

*FPD reorganized itself into 6 global practices <strong>at</strong> the end of FY11. FPD staff d<strong>at</strong>a include only IBRD head counts.<br />

5.28 SDN is the largest network, its staff numbers exceeding th<strong>at</strong> of the FPD,<br />

HDN, and PREM networks combined. <strong>The</strong> m<strong>at</strong>rix system directly affects 78 percent<br />

of the Bank’s staff. In FY 11, of the 11,402 total Bank staff, 6,235 were loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the six<br />

regions (Appendix M, Table M.1) and 1,630 in the anchors of four networks (FPD,<br />

HDN, PREM, SDN) plus OPCS 70 (Table 5.2). <strong>The</strong> size differential between SDN and<br />

other networks remains true among network anchor staff as well as when the<br />

combined strength of anchor and regional staff of the networks are compared.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!