Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Rights</strong> of the Disabled<br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
legal and moral clarifications from the standpoint of international human rights law. During the<br />
session, the <strong>Commission</strong>’s nominee networks with other participating national institutions,<br />
convenes coordination meetings, presents well researched proposals and prepares daily reports<br />
for circulation among the <strong>National</strong> Institutions. In addition she also participates in the side events<br />
organized by the inter-governmental regional groupings, NGOs and other stakeholders.<br />
5.14 The pace intensity and the level of negotiations during the sixth session point to the fact<br />
that the process is heading towards completion. The Committee has made considerable progress<br />
and a large measure of agreement has been reached. There are a number of issues on which<br />
wide support is available. However, sharp differences continue to persist regarding:<br />
a. The current state of jurisprudence relating to the nature of economic, social and cultural<br />
rights and the issue of progressive and immediate realization of those rights;<br />
b. The definition of “discrimination” under international law and how it relates to disability<br />
(including the issue of intersectionality, or multiple discrimination under existing human<br />
rights law);<br />
c. Private freedoms and obligations of the State.<br />
d. Elaboration of rights incorporating treaty body interpretations through General Comments.<br />
5.15 Despite international and domestic actions taken, however, the physically and mentally<br />
challenged persons in our country continue to face several obstacles in leading their life with<br />
dignity. During the reporting period a questionnaire was circulated to the ministries and<br />
departments in Government of India, States and UT Administrations to ascertain the number of<br />
schemes and affirmative action programmes introduced by them to guarantee right to health,<br />
housing, assistive devices, education, vocational training, employment and social security benefits.<br />
From the responses received it was difficult to draw any authoritative conclusion, as they were<br />
generally evasive, hiding more than revealing.<br />
5.16 It seems disability continues to be treated as a unidimensional subject with major<br />
responsibilities being shared by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment and its counter<br />
parts in the States. The relative indifference of a number of ministries and departments is a major<br />
obstacle in the overall development and mainstreaming of disability. Likewise the function of<br />
the Central and the State Coordination Committees is far from satisfactory. Disabilities Act in<br />
Sections 8 (2)(b) & (c) and in Sections 18(2) (b) & (c), requires the Central and the State<br />
Coordination Committees to develop a <strong>National</strong>/State Policy to address issues faced by persons<br />
with disabilities and advise the Government on the formulation of policies, programmes, legislation<br />
and projects with respect to disability. It is a pity that even after ten years of the enactment of the<br />
Disabilities Act the mechanisms responsible to evolve a disability policy have failed to do so.<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
87<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
107<br />
7/17/06, 6:29 PM