19.11.2014 Views

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annexure 14<br />

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

○<br />

the disabled. The project seeks to build the capacity of legal practioners, disability rights and<br />

human rights activists to address problems of discrimination, marginalization and exclusion of<br />

persons with disability.<br />

Mr. Chairman,<br />

In the past one year, the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> of India faced a number of<br />

challenges and took several bold steps to protect the rights of persons belonging to vulnerable<br />

sections like minorities, dalits, the disabled, women and others.<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong> has continued to play an active role in regard to communal disturbances in<br />

the State of Gujarat, beginning with the tragedy that occurred in Godhra on 27 February<br />

2002 continuing with the violence that ensued, and the process of establishment of justice<br />

and due rehabilitation of the victims. In the year 2003, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued notice to the<br />

Government of Gujarat on the matter of the protection of victims and witnesses. Convinced<br />

that fair trial is a constitutional imperative for victims, witnesses and accused persons alike,<br />

the <strong>Commission</strong> viewed the acquittal by the Trial Court of persons who were accused of<br />

burning alive 14 persons in what has come to be known as the ‘Best Bakery case’ as<br />

`miscarriage of justice’. It filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court on 31 July<br />

2003 with a prayer to set aside the judgement of the Trial Court and sought directions for<br />

further investigation by an independent agency and retrial of the case. The Supreme Court<br />

by its verdict dated 12.4.2004 has set aside the judgment of acquittal in the said case and<br />

further directed fresh investigation into the case and its re-trial outside the State of Gujarat<br />

in the State of Maharashtra with a further direction to appoint Public Prosecutor for<br />

prosecuting the case.<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong> has also filed a separate application for transfer of four other serious cases<br />

which had been identified in its proceedings of 1 April 2002.<br />

Besides, the <strong>Commission</strong> has extended legal assistance to Ms. Bilkis Yakub Rasul, a victim of<br />

alleged mass rape in Gujarat during the post-Godhra communal disturbances. Following this,<br />

the Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the case.<br />

The CBI has succeeded in arresting a number of accused persons including certain police officials<br />

in this case. The proceedings in all these cases are continuing in the Supreme Court.<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong> took up the issue of enforced or involuntary disappearances in Jammu &<br />

Kashmir. On 14 May 2003, the <strong>Commission</strong> directed the Government of J&K to furnish the<br />

following information:<br />

i) whether the State Government has established a system to record allegations of enforced<br />

or involuntary disappearances and, if so, the nature of that system;<br />

310<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />

AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />

330<br />

7/17/06, 6:31 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!