Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annexure 14<br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
the disabled. The project seeks to build the capacity of legal practioners, disability rights and<br />
human rights activists to address problems of discrimination, marginalization and exclusion of<br />
persons with disability.<br />
Mr. Chairman,<br />
In the past one year, the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> of India faced a number of<br />
challenges and took several bold steps to protect the rights of persons belonging to vulnerable<br />
sections like minorities, dalits, the disabled, women and others.<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong> has continued to play an active role in regard to communal disturbances in<br />
the State of Gujarat, beginning with the tragedy that occurred in Godhra on 27 February<br />
2002 continuing with the violence that ensued, and the process of establishment of justice<br />
and due rehabilitation of the victims. In the year 2003, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued notice to the<br />
Government of Gujarat on the matter of the protection of victims and witnesses. Convinced<br />
that fair trial is a constitutional imperative for victims, witnesses and accused persons alike,<br />
the <strong>Commission</strong> viewed the acquittal by the Trial Court of persons who were accused of<br />
burning alive 14 persons in what has come to be known as the ‘Best Bakery case’ as<br />
`miscarriage of justice’. It filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court on 31 July<br />
2003 with a prayer to set aside the judgement of the Trial Court and sought directions for<br />
further investigation by an independent agency and retrial of the case. The Supreme Court<br />
by its verdict dated 12.4.2004 has set aside the judgment of acquittal in the said case and<br />
further directed fresh investigation into the case and its re-trial outside the State of Gujarat<br />
in the State of Maharashtra with a further direction to appoint Public Prosecutor for<br />
prosecuting the case.<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong> has also filed a separate application for transfer of four other serious cases<br />
which had been identified in its proceedings of 1 April 2002.<br />
Besides, the <strong>Commission</strong> has extended legal assistance to Ms. Bilkis Yakub Rasul, a victim of<br />
alleged mass rape in Gujarat during the post-Godhra communal disturbances. Following this,<br />
the Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the case.<br />
The CBI has succeeded in arresting a number of accused persons including certain police officials<br />
in this case. The proceedings in all these cases are continuing in the Supreme Court.<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong> took up the issue of enforced or involuntary disappearances in Jammu &<br />
Kashmir. On 14 May 2003, the <strong>Commission</strong> directed the Government of J&K to furnish the<br />
following information:<br />
i) whether the State Government has established a system to record allegations of enforced<br />
or involuntary disappearances and, if so, the nature of that system;<br />
310<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
330<br />
7/17/06, 6:31 PM