Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annexure 12<br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
professional techniques of investigation, and scientific tools of carrying out investigation and<br />
dealing with human beings. It would be ideal to involve not only professional agencies but<br />
also NGOs working on the anti-trafficking front in formulating training modules and carrying<br />
out training programmes. It is also essential that proper post-training evaluation is carried out<br />
to understand the effects of training and to upgrade/change the modules and programmes<br />
accordingly.<br />
Special Courts<br />
The ITPA provides for establishment of special courts not only by the state governments but<br />
also by the central government. However, the latter has never been invoked and the former has<br />
been minimally implemented. The concerned government departments should take initiatives in<br />
setting up special courts, and preferably exclusive courts, to deal with the trial of offences under<br />
ITPA, so that justice can be delivered expeditiously.<br />
Role of DWCD in Monitoring<br />
ITPA is a social legislation. Since it comes under the purview of DWCD, there is a need to<br />
monitor the implementation of this legislation by the latter. It is an irony that DWCD is not even<br />
a party to the several fora where such crimes are discussed, as for example, the annual conference<br />
of the police chiefs of the states, organized by the MHA. The violation of women’s rights and<br />
child rights has to be prevented and set right. This calls for an active involvement of DWCD not<br />
only in monitoring of the facts and figures regarding the implementation of ITPA and other<br />
similar legislations, but also in developing a working partnership between law enforcement<br />
agencies, welfare and developmental departments, NGOs etc.<br />
Suggested Changes in ITPA<br />
The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITPA) was initially known as the Suppression<br />
of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956 (SITA). It underwent certain changes in 1978. However, taking<br />
into consideration international and national developments, the necessity of shifting the<br />
focus of the law from suppression to prevention was felt. Accordingly, the legislation<br />
underwent major changes in the title and content, giving rise to ITPA, 1956. During this<br />
research, several efforts were made to have a practical understanding and a social audit of<br />
this legislation. While interviewing police officials, survivors, exploiters, etc., their opinion<br />
on the issue was sought. A focus group discussion (FGD) was arranged with judicial officers<br />
serving in the district courts. This FGD was made possible by the NHRC. In addition, the<br />
NST participated in several training programmes of judicial officers held in different parts<br />
of the country. The interactive sessions threw up several points on law and law enforcement.<br />
Thereafter, FGDs were held at ISS with lawyers from Delhi and Mumbai who are specifically<br />
working on ITPA. All the above-mentioned activities facilitated the detailed understanding<br />
of the provision and implementation of ITPA. In addition, the literature on the subject was<br />
also reviewed. The <strong>National</strong> Law School University, Bangalore, had prepared two sets of<br />
alternative draft legislations. The analytical articles and critical comments by eminent jurists<br />
292<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
312<br />
7/17/06, 6:31 PM