Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Complaints Before the <strong>Commission</strong><br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
7. Death of Shri Kolumbus in Judical Custody in Uttar Pradesh Case No. 20143/24/<br />
2002-2003-CD]<br />
4.53 The <strong>Commission</strong> received an intimation dated 10/9/2002 from the Superintendent, District<br />
Jail Lucknow stating that one Shri Kolumbus S/o Sudama, aged 26 years, an undertrial prisoner,<br />
allegedly lodged in Session lock up at Lucknow was assaulted with knife and razor allegedly<br />
by three co-prisoners in lock up. Kolumbus received serious injuries and was referred to KGMC<br />
hospital, Lucknow on 8/9/2002 where he succumbed to his injuries during the course of<br />
treatment.<br />
4.54 The <strong>Commission</strong> obtained a report from the Superintendent, Lucknow Jail which<br />
indicated that Kolumbus was injured by his co-prisoner while he was in the session lock up<br />
and though no jail officer or staff was responsible for the incident, the injuries were received<br />
by Kolumbus due to negligence of the concerned police personnel of the Session’s lock up.<br />
The magisterial inquiry report also concluded that the UTP, Kolumbus died due to injuries<br />
sustained by him in an attack by his co-prisoners while he was in jail custody in session’s<br />
lock up.<br />
4.55 The report further mentioned that a crime No. 365/2002 had been registered against the<br />
accused co-prisoner and charge sheet filed against them.<br />
4.56 Upon consideration of the report, the <strong>Commission</strong> observed as under:-<br />
4.57 The attack on the UTP Kolumbus by his co-prisoners was with sharp-edged weapons<br />
like knife and razor. The co-prisoners had these weapons available to them in the lock-up<br />
is a matter of serious concern and discloses lapse on the part of the authorities<br />
responsible for maintenance of the lock up. The incident must have taken some time as the<br />
deceased suffered multiple injuries as per post-mortem report and during all this period no<br />
attempt was made by the police officials in charge of the lock-up to save the deceased<br />
from being attacked. This also shows a very callous attitude, and is prima facie evidence of<br />
negligence of the concerned police personnel, besides dereliction of duty on their part. This<br />
prima facie, establishes the negligence on the part of the State machinery and dereliction<br />
of duty of the concerned police personnel.<br />
4.58 In response to the show cause notice issued to the DGP, UP, he informed that the guilty<br />
police personnel had been placed under suspension and appropriate action is being taken against<br />
them in accordance with the law. No response was, however, received to the show cause notice<br />
from the Chief Secretary, UP, inspite of reminders. The <strong>Commission</strong>, therefore, recommended<br />
to the State Government to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the next of kin of the deceased as<br />
interim relief u/s 18 (3) of the Protection of <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Act, 1993. Compliance report from<br />
the State Government was still awaited.<br />
34<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
54<br />
7/17/06, 6:29 PM