Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annexure 8<br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
Southern Region Public Hearing on the<br />
Right to Health Care Held on 29 th<br />
August, 2004 at Chennai<br />
Key Findings and Recommendations in Response to Oral and<br />
Written Testimonies for the States of Kerala, Tamil Nadu,<br />
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Pondicherry<br />
1. Access to Primary Health Care through the Public Sector Health<br />
System<br />
Primary health care is understood in a more limited way as services made available through<br />
Sub-Centre (SCs), Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs).<br />
●<br />
Pondicherry received positive community response regarding the availability and quality of<br />
primary health care services.<br />
●<br />
There were no complaints from Kerala though issues regarding essential drugs, environmental<br />
health and trauma care were raised which come within a broader understanding of primary<br />
health care (covered in item 5,6,7).<br />
●<br />
In Karnataka and AP the irrational siting of PHCs (possibly under political pressure) made<br />
access to health care very difficult and sometimes impossible. Some of the farthest villages<br />
were 40 – 50 kms away, and in other cases there was no easy bus access to PHCs / SCs. In<br />
AP; subcentres that were supposed to be there were non-existent or non-functional. In<br />
Tamilnadu, Karnataka and AP there were problems with regard to quality of care, referrals<br />
and staff attitudes.<br />
Recommendation 1<br />
●<br />
The siting/distribution and physical accessibility of PHCs and subcentres must be ensured.<br />
They should provide good quality services during the prescribed timings. Indicators and<br />
mechanisms for monitoring quality of care need to be developed and used. No money<br />
should be taken for services that are to be provided free. The citizens charter for services at<br />
PHCs should be prominently displayed and implemented. Staff vacancies need to be filled<br />
up and staff needs such as quarters, toilets, water supply and electricity need to be ensured.<br />
Adequate provision of medicines, laboratory equipment and consumables, registers etc is a<br />
basic requirement. Maintaining staff motivation through good management practices will<br />
help improve the quality of services and to foster a relationship of mutual respect and trust<br />
between providers and people.<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
239<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
259<br />
7/17/06, 6:31 PM