19.11.2014 Views

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Complaints Before the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

○<br />

e) Other Important Cases<br />

23. Punjab Mass Cremation Case<br />

4.140 The <strong>Commission</strong> received a remit, from the Supreme Court of India to examine 2097<br />

cremations of dead bodies as un-identified by the Punjab Police in the Police District of Amritsar,<br />

Majitha and Tarn Taran, Punjab during the period w.e.f. 1984 to 1994. While remitting the<br />

matter to the <strong>Commission</strong>, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India directed the CBI to take further<br />

action into the matter and register the cases where necessary, hold investigations and proceed<br />

in accordance with the law on the basis of material collected through investigation. For the<br />

remaining issues the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India requested the <strong>Commission</strong> to examine<br />

the matter.<br />

4.141 In furtherance of the remit, the <strong>Commission</strong> considered the matter from time to time and<br />

vide its proceedings dated 11.11.2004, it unhesitantly held that human rights of 109 persons,<br />

who were admittedly in the custody of the police immediately prior to their death, stood invaded<br />

and infringed when they lost their lives, while in custody of the police thereby rendering the<br />

state vicariously liable. There was a very great responsibility on the part of the police and other<br />

authorities to take reasonable care so that citizens in their custody were ‘safe’ and not deprived<br />

of their right to life as in such cases “the duty of care on the part of the State is strict and admits<br />

of non-exception.” The State of Punjab was, therefore, held accountable and vicariously<br />

responsible for the infringement of the indefeasible right to life of those 109 deceased persons as<br />

it failed to “safeguard their lives and persons against the risk of avoidable harm.”<br />

4.142 The <strong>Commission</strong> found itself totally justified and, in the facts and circumstances of the<br />

case, duty bound and obliged to redress and grievances of the next of kin of the deceased by<br />

award of monetary compensation for infringement of the indefeasible right to life of deceased<br />

and apply balm to their wounds.<br />

4.143 The <strong>Commission</strong> awarded a total compensation of Rs.2,72,50,000/- @ Rs.2.50 lakhs<br />

to the next of kin of each of 109 deceased persons who we admittedly in the custody of the<br />

Punjab Police at the time of their death. The <strong>Commission</strong> is in the process of examining the<br />

claims in relation to the remaining cremations and grievances raised by the next of kin of the<br />

other deceased.<br />

24. Displacement of farmers and agricultural labourers by construction of a barrage<br />

across the river Nagavalli – relief and rehabilitation: Andhra Pradesh – Case No.<br />

667/1/2002-2003(FC)<br />

4.144 Shri V. Kishore Chandra S. Deo, former Union Minister vide his reference dated 4-2-<br />

2003 invited attention of the <strong>Commission</strong> towards the misery and suffering which had occurred<br />

50<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />

AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />

70<br />

7/17/06, 6:29 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!