Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Annual Report - National Human Rights Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Complaints Before the <strong>Commission</strong><br />
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />
○<br />
e) Other Important Cases<br />
23. Punjab Mass Cremation Case<br />
4.140 The <strong>Commission</strong> received a remit, from the Supreme Court of India to examine 2097<br />
cremations of dead bodies as un-identified by the Punjab Police in the Police District of Amritsar,<br />
Majitha and Tarn Taran, Punjab during the period w.e.f. 1984 to 1994. While remitting the<br />
matter to the <strong>Commission</strong>, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India directed the CBI to take further<br />
action into the matter and register the cases where necessary, hold investigations and proceed<br />
in accordance with the law on the basis of material collected through investigation. For the<br />
remaining issues the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India requested the <strong>Commission</strong> to examine<br />
the matter.<br />
4.141 In furtherance of the remit, the <strong>Commission</strong> considered the matter from time to time and<br />
vide its proceedings dated 11.11.2004, it unhesitantly held that human rights of 109 persons,<br />
who were admittedly in the custody of the police immediately prior to their death, stood invaded<br />
and infringed when they lost their lives, while in custody of the police thereby rendering the<br />
state vicariously liable. There was a very great responsibility on the part of the police and other<br />
authorities to take reasonable care so that citizens in their custody were ‘safe’ and not deprived<br />
of their right to life as in such cases “the duty of care on the part of the State is strict and admits<br />
of non-exception.” The State of Punjab was, therefore, held accountable and vicariously<br />
responsible for the infringement of the indefeasible right to life of those 109 deceased persons as<br />
it failed to “safeguard their lives and persons against the risk of avoidable harm.”<br />
4.142 The <strong>Commission</strong> found itself totally justified and, in the facts and circumstances of the<br />
case, duty bound and obliged to redress and grievances of the next of kin of the deceased by<br />
award of monetary compensation for infringement of the indefeasible right to life of deceased<br />
and apply balm to their wounds.<br />
4.143 The <strong>Commission</strong> awarded a total compensation of Rs.2,72,50,000/- @ Rs.2.50 lakhs<br />
to the next of kin of each of 109 deceased persons who we admittedly in the custody of the<br />
Punjab Police at the time of their death. The <strong>Commission</strong> is in the process of examining the<br />
claims in relation to the remaining cremations and grievances raised by the next of kin of the<br />
other deceased.<br />
24. Displacement of farmers and agricultural labourers by construction of a barrage<br />
across the river Nagavalli – relief and rehabilitation: Andhra Pradesh – Case No.<br />
667/1/2002-2003(FC)<br />
4.144 Shri V. Kishore Chandra S. Deo, former Union Minister vide his reference dated 4-2-<br />
2003 invited attention of the <strong>Commission</strong> towards the misery and suffering which had occurred<br />
50<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> - 2004-2005<br />
AR-Chapter-1-19-10-6-06.p65<br />
70<br />
7/17/06, 6:29 PM