Photonic crystals in biology
Photonic crystals in biology
Photonic crystals in biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Session, Tuesday, June 15<br />
Theme A1 - B702<br />
Large Area Micropatterned Polymer Surfaces from Polypropylene/Polyethylene Copolymer<br />
and Polystyrene Blends<br />
Nev<strong>in</strong> Atalay Gengeç*, H. <br />
Gebze Institute of Technology, Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Department, 41400, Gebze-<br />
Abstract- In this study, a novel method for fabricat<strong>in</strong>g polymer th<strong>in</strong> films hav<strong>in</strong>g cyl<strong>in</strong>drical micro-patterns vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the range of 2 to<br />
30 m on the surface is presented. These large area micropatterned surfaces were prepared by dip-coat<strong>in</strong>g process us<strong>in</strong>g polymer blend<br />
solutions. Static contact angles and surface morphology of these th<strong>in</strong> films were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g KSV CAM 200 contact angle<br />
apparatus and optical microscopy. The change <strong>in</strong> the surface morphology of the th<strong>in</strong> film coat<strong>in</strong>gs with the change <strong>in</strong> the solvent/nonsolvent<br />
ratio of polymer solutions, and also coat<strong>in</strong>g conditions were <strong>in</strong>vestigated. We can control the distribution of the pattern<br />
diameter via adjust<strong>in</strong>g solvent/non-solvent ratio and the withdrawal speed of the dip coater.<br />
The properties of polymer blends are determ<strong>in</strong>ed ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
by the miscibility of the components and their<br />
structures. 1,2 Polymer mixtures demix dur<strong>in</strong>g the rapid<br />
solvent cast<strong>in</strong>g process due to <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic immiscibility of<br />
the polymer component <strong>in</strong> the blend. In general, the<br />
resultant phase-separated morphology is far from the<br />
thermodynamic equilibrium and the relaxation toward<br />
equilibrium can be h<strong>in</strong>dered by k<strong>in</strong>etic barriers formed by<br />
the non-equilibrium phase morphology. Surface<br />
segregation is a result of a balance of surface tension<br />
forces and bulk mix<strong>in</strong>g thermodynamic forces. 3,4 The<br />
surface properties of the polymer coat<strong>in</strong>gs can be<br />
modified by apply<strong>in</strong>g plasma treatment, surface graft<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
film deposition under vacuum, etc. Most of these methods<br />
are comparatively expensive and difficult to apply on a<br />
large area scale. However, Erbil et al. obta<strong>in</strong>ed microstructured<br />
gel-like porous superhydrophobic surfaces via<br />
phase separation us<strong>in</strong>g isotatic propylene (iPP) solutions<br />
with different solvent/non-solvent ratio and this method is<br />
easier and cheaper than other methods. 4<br />
In this study, large area micro patterned surfaces were<br />
prepared by dip coat<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g mixed polymer solutions<br />
and pattern diameters rang<strong>in</strong>g from 2m to 40 m were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Polystyrene and polypropylene/polyethylene<br />
copolymer (PS-PPPE) blend solutions were prepared<br />
separately <strong>in</strong> tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 60 o C and then<br />
these solutions were mixed as 50:50 (wt %) blend<br />
composition. Glass slides were dip coated <strong>in</strong> these<br />
polymer blend solutions at different dipper speeds at 60<br />
o C. In some recipes, vary<strong>in</strong>g amounts of ethanol was<br />
added as a non-solvent. The change <strong>in</strong> the surface<br />
morphology of the th<strong>in</strong> coat<strong>in</strong>gs with the change <strong>in</strong> the<br />
solvent/non-solvent ratio (THF/EtOH) of polymer<br />
solutions, and also coat<strong>in</strong>g conditions such as dipper<br />
speed and temperature were <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Static contact<br />
angles and surface morphology of th<strong>in</strong> films conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
micro-patterns were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g KSV CAM 200<br />
contact angle apparatus and optical microscopy,<br />
respectively.<br />
Pillar diameters were decreased from 20 m to 2 m with<br />
the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the dipp<strong>in</strong>g rate and also the heterogeneity<br />
of the pillar diameters on surfaces was decreased with the<br />
dipp<strong>in</strong>g rate. Figure 1 shows the optical microscopy<br />
images of the surfaces obta<strong>in</strong>ed at the optimum dipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
speed and different methanol fractions. It is clearly seen<br />
from the results that the pillar diameters <strong>in</strong>creased with<br />
the <strong>in</strong>crease of methanol fraction. When methanol volume<br />
fraction was low, scattered form of particles with uniform<br />
cyl<strong>in</strong>drical geometry were observed which have their<br />
diameters around 2 m. With the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the methanol<br />
amount <strong>in</strong> the solution, these particles diameters were<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased up to 30 m.<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
Fig1. Optical microscopy images of 25 mg/mL PS/PPPE solution <strong>in</strong><br />
THF (50 wt %) with a) 0,5, b) 10 wt % methanol at room temparature<br />
In summary, particles shape and dimensions were varied<br />
as a function of non-solvent <strong>in</strong> the solution and dipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rate. The water contact angle of the surfaces is constant<br />
around 116 o . Equilibrium contact angle and contact angle<br />
hysteresis results will be discussed at presentation.<br />
* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: natalay@gyte.edu.tr<br />
1. Olabisi O., Robeson L.M., Shaw M.T., London:<br />
Academic Press; 1979.<br />
2. Paul D.R., Newman S., Polymer blends, vol. 1. New<br />
York: Academic Press; 1978.<br />
3. Khayet M., Vazquez Alvarez M., Khuble K.C.,<br />
Matsuura T., 2007, 601, 885<br />
4. Erbil H.Y., Demirel A.L., Avci Y., Mert O. Science<br />
2003, 299, 1377.<br />
6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 324