09.01.2015 Views

Photonic crystals in biology

Photonic crystals in biology

Photonic crystals in biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Session, Tuesday, June 15<br />

Theme A1 - B702<br />

Size and magnetic field effects on InAs/GaAs self assembled quantum dot nanostructure<br />

1<br />

Imen Saïdi, Karim Sellami 1 *and Kaïs Boujdaria 1<br />

Laboratoire de physique des matériaux, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, 7021 Jarzouna, Tunisia<br />

Abstract-In this present work we <strong>in</strong>vestigated theoretically, with<strong>in</strong> the effective mass approximation, the electron and hole states <strong>in</strong> InAs/GaAs<br />

self assembled quantum dots under an external magnetic field. First, us<strong>in</strong>g the k.p theory, a theoretical 40x40 model was performed to calculate<br />

the InAs and GaAS semiconductor band structure, and extract the different physical parameters. Then, us<strong>in</strong>g an accurate numerical<br />

diagonalization method on Fourrier-Bessel function basis over a large cyl<strong>in</strong>der doma<strong>in</strong>, we calculated numerically the electron and hole eigen<br />

energies and associated wave functions. We considered thereafter the effect of the magnetic field and quantum dot size variation on the charge<br />

carrier energy levels. It is clearly found that the electron and hole energy spectra changes significantly when the quantum size parameters are<br />

modified as well as the magnetic field. Given this strik<strong>in</strong>g nanostructure size dependent property, these systems provide the opportunity to<br />

control and tune their optical and electronic properties through t heses parameters.<br />

Self-Assembled Quantum dots, commonly referred to as<br />

self-organized quantum dots, form spontaneously under<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> growth conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g molecular beam epitaxy or<br />

metal organic chemical vapor deposition, as a consequence of<br />

lattice-mismatch between the semiconductor deposited<br />

material and underly<strong>in</strong>g substrate [1]. The result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

semiconductor nanostructures consist of three dimensional<br />

islands stand<strong>in</strong>g on a two-dimensional wett<strong>in</strong>g layer. Such<br />

islands can be subsequently buried to realize quantum<br />

conf<strong>in</strong>ement. In the past 15 years, self assembled quantum<br />

dots have provided vast opportunities for physical research<br />

and technological applications, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g quantum<br />

cryptography, quantum comput<strong>in</strong>g, optics and optoelectronics.<br />

Consequently, 0Tworldwide efforts <strong>in</strong> both theory and<br />

experimental <strong>in</strong>vestigations have driven the fasc<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aspects of these nanostructures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g growth,<br />

characterization, and applications of quantum dots <strong>in</strong>to an<br />

advanced multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary field [2].<br />

In the frame work of the effective mass approximation the<br />

electron (hole) hamiltonien is written as:<br />

2<br />

2<br />

P meh ( ) ceh ( ) <br />

2 ceh<br />

( ) <br />

H Vconf i ge( h)<br />

BB.<br />

<br />

2meh<br />

( )<br />

2 2 2 <br />

m eh<br />

where is the electron (hole) masse calculated through the<br />

( )<br />

Lutt<strong>in</strong>ger parameters extracted from a 40-band k.p model [3].<br />

ceh<br />

is the electron (hole) cyclotron frequency which is<br />

( )<br />

written as function of the magnetic field B as: eB<br />

.<br />

ce( h)<br />

g is the Landé Factor [4], and is the sp<strong>in</strong> operator. meh<br />

( )<br />

V denotes the quantum dot conf<strong>in</strong>ement potential that takes<br />

conf<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account the shape of the nanostructure chosen as a<br />

truncated cone as represented below. This potential can be<br />

expressed as V ( r)<br />

V0 (1 D(<br />

z,<br />

))<br />

, where V 0<br />

is the band offset<br />

potential and D is the quantum doma<strong>in</strong> wich is written as:<br />

QD<br />

WL<br />

D( z,<br />

)<br />

D ( z,<br />

)<br />

D ( z,<br />

)<br />

where and D WL stands for<br />

respectively the quantum and wett<strong>in</strong>g layer doma<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g an accurate numerical diagonalization method on a<br />

Fourrier Bessel basis over a large cyl<strong>in</strong>der doma<strong>in</strong>, the<br />

electron (hole) states can be written as:<br />

n,<br />

n, c <br />

<br />

ij<br />

n<br />

ij , <br />

n ij<br />

n <strong>in</strong> <br />

e i <br />

j <br />

where: nij reh<br />

i e Jn( e<br />

)s<strong>in</strong> z, with Z and R are<br />

R Z <br />

n<br />

respectively the height and the radius of large cyl<strong>in</strong>der. is<br />

i<br />

n<br />

the ith root of the n-order Bessel function J , and<br />

n<br />

c<br />

i ,<br />

is the<br />

j<br />

normalization constant.<br />

We calculated numerically the electron and hole eigen<br />

energies and associated wave functions <strong>in</strong> a truncated cone<br />

shaped InAs/GaAs quantum dot. Our result revealed that this<br />

calculation method provide more accurate results compared to<br />

the commonly used variationnal method.<br />

It is clearly shown that the electron and hole energy spectrum<br />

changes significantly as function of the quantum dot radius.<br />

We notice that from a def<strong>in</strong>ite radius R d , the charge carrierstates<br />

beg<strong>in</strong> to appear <strong>in</strong> the quantum dot, and if R

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!