09.01.2015 Views

Photonic crystals in biology

Photonic crystals in biology

Photonic crystals in biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session, Tuesday, June 15<br />

Theme A1 - B702<br />

Rapid detection of Escherichia coli by nanoparticle bas ed immunomag netic separation and SERS<br />

Burcu Guven 1 , Nese Basaran Akgul 1 , Erhan Temur 2 , Ugur Tamer 2 1 *<br />

1 Department of Food Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Faculty of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Hacettepe University, Beytepe 06800, Ankara, Turkey<br />

2 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, 06330 Ankara, Turkey<br />

Abstract- Detection of microbial pathogen <strong>in</strong> food is the solution and to the prevention and recognition of problems related to<br />

health and safety. In this study, a method comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and surface-enhanced Raman<br />

scatter<strong>in</strong>g (SERS) was developed to detect Escherichia coli (E. coli). The ability of the<br />

immunoassay to detect E. coli <strong>in</strong> real water samples was <strong>in</strong>vestigated and the results were compared with the experimental<br />

results from plate-count<strong>in</strong>g methods.<br />

Nanomaterials can be conjugated with different<br />

biomolecules such as nucleic acids 1, peptides and<br />

prote<strong>in</strong>s, antibodies 2, carbohydrates, and antibiotics 3.<br />

One of the most important research field of nanoscience<br />

and nanotechnology is the control and detection of various<br />

microorganisms 4. The major advantage of us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nanomaterials <strong>in</strong>stead of microbeads is the higher capture<br />

efficiency due to the high surface-to-volume ratio. Other<br />

advantages of us<strong>in</strong>g nanoparticles <strong>in</strong>clude faster reaction<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etics and m<strong>in</strong>imal sample preparation 5.<br />

Escherichia coli (E. coli), which found <strong>in</strong> large numbers<br />

among the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e of humans and other warm-blooded<br />

animals spread abroad <strong>in</strong> natural environment, is the major<br />

cause of <strong>in</strong>fection outbreaks with serious consequences 6.<br />

More recently, several rapid assays for detect<strong>in</strong>g E. coli<br />

based on different measur<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, such as<br />

polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction immunoassay, optical assay<br />

etc., have been developed. Although these methods<br />

shortened the detection time vary<strong>in</strong>g from several hours to<br />

one day, many of these methods are still time-consum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and poor <strong>in</strong> sensitivity. In recent years, due to magnetic<br />

properties, low toxicity and biocompatibility, magnetic<br />

nanoparticles (MNPs) receive considerable attention.<br />

In this study a method comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g immunomagnetic<br />

separation (IMS) and surface-enhanced Raman scatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(SERS) was developed to detect<br />

Escherichia coli (E. coli). Polyclonal antibody specific<br />

for the E. coli antigen was added to gold coated magnetic<br />

nanoparticles to create antibody-coated beads. Then gold<br />

coated nanoparticles which are treated with 5,5 -<br />

0Tdithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB)) are <strong>in</strong>teracted<br />

with gold coated magnetic nanoparticles and the<br />

calibration curve was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> surface-enhanced Raman<br />

scatter<strong>in</strong>g. The captur<strong>in</strong>g efficiency was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

different E. coli concentrations (10 1- 10 7 ).<br />

The selectivity of the developed sensor was exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter dissolvens,<br />

which did not produce any significant response (Figure 1).<br />

compared with the experimental results from platecount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods. There was no significant difference<br />

between the methods that were compared (p>0.05). This<br />

method is rapid and sensitive to target organisms.<br />

This work was partially supported by TUBITAK under<br />

Grant No. TBA G-107T682.<br />

*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: ihb@hacettepe.edu.tr<br />

1 Q. Zhang, L. Zhu, H. Feng, S. Ang, F.S. Chau, and W.-T. Liu,<br />

Microbial detection <strong>in</strong> microfluidic devices through dual sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

of quantum dots-labeled immunoassay and RNA hybridization.<br />

Anal. Chim. Acta 556, 171–177 (2006).<br />

2 T. Elk<strong>in</strong>, X. Jiang, S. Taylor, Y. L<strong>in</strong>, H. Yang, J. Brown, S.<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>s and Y.-P. Sun, Immuno-carbon nanotubes and<br />

recognition of pathogens. ChemBioChem. 6, 640–643 (2005).<br />

3 P. Li, J. Li, C. Wu, Q. Wu and J. Li, Synergistic antibacterial<br />

effects of b-lactam antibiotic comb<strong>in</strong>ed with silver nanoparticles.<br />

Nanotechnology 16, 1912–1917 (2005).<br />

4 P.G. Luo, F.J. Stutzenberger, Nanotechnology <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Detection and Control of Microorganisms. Advances <strong>in</strong> Applied<br />

Micro<strong>biology</strong>, Volume 63 (2008).<br />

5 M. Varshney, L. Yang, X.L. Su, Y.Li, Magnetic nanoparticleantibody<br />

conjugates for the separation of Escherichia coli<br />

O157:H7 <strong>in</strong> ground beef. (2005).<br />

Journal of Food Protection 68, 1804–1811.<br />

6 Y. Cheng, Y. Liu, J. Huang, K. Li, W. Zhang, Y. Xian, L. J<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles and ATP<br />

biolum<strong>in</strong>escence for rapid detection of Escherichia coli. Talanta<br />

77 1332–1336 (2009).<br />

SERS Intensity counts/s<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Enterobacter<br />

aerogenes<br />

Enterobacter<br />

di ssol vens<br />

Escherichia coli<br />

Figure 1. The SERS <strong>in</strong>tensities of E. aerogenes, E. dissolvens,<br />

and E. coli at fixed concentration.<br />

The ability of the immunoassay to detect E. coli <strong>in</strong> real<br />

water samples was <strong>in</strong>vestigated and the results were<br />

6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!