PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Haeg: Him essentially selling me out to the - the State and then lying about it like I’ve showed you and told you over and over again. I guess... Robinson: Well I – I – you’ve told me that he’s lied to... Haeg: You’ve never asked for proof. I mean I could have showed you proof but if I tell you and alls you’d have to say Chuck is “show me the proof” and I would’ve laid it right out in front of you but you never even asked about that. Robinson: But as I... Haeg: So now it feels to me like this “good ole boys club” that you talked to me about the - the cops, and the prosecutors, and the judges I feel like there’s a “good ole boys club” with the lawyers – that’s what I feel. I feel like a hunted animal Chuck and you know what I’m the youngest master guide in the State of Alaska and I know what it is to be hunted. Robinson: I don’t know because I don’t know what the claim would be. All I’m telling you is that if you have in your mind a suit against me for an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel we have a conflict. Haeg: What I’m saying - I guess what I’m saying is I think that you know and I’m not a lawyer - you know - I just read like a maniac – you know – I’m catching up to you lawyers fast is that I think that there was the possibility of going back and showing ineffectiveness of Brent. I mean I don’t see how you can dance around – like you say I’m dancing around whatever – well I’m learning from you guys – dance around the fact that if your attorney’s lying to you he could be anything but ineffective and if Brent was ineffective it would’ve rolled back the clock to before I ever hired him. That’s – that’s what I feel and that’s just me reading the books. That’s not me having – you know - experience in it that’s me just reading the bare law and what happens to my brain when I read the US Supreme Courts definition of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Jackie did find one case where an attorney was proven to lie to his client his case was overturned. I can prove that my first attorney was lying to me, I feel my case should be overturned because he put me in such a bad position that there’s no matter how good of an attorney you were Chuck I was still goanna sink and I think that you – you know I think that you should’ve used that avenue to help me get out but I have my own personal feelings that you know the “old boys club” you talked about with the Troopers, and the Judges, and the DA – I think there’s a “old boys club” in the lawyers club. Is there an “old boys club” in the lawyers, Chuck Robinson: No not that I’m a part of. But... Haeg: So you would not help – you would not pull a few strings to help Brent Cole from being... Robinson: No I wouldn’t - as a matter of fact I’m the one that told you the things that I thought he did wrong. 100
Haeg: Well why Chuck then did I pay you for a subpoena for Brent Cole and Brent Cole never showed up Now that’s one that I can’t get over. Robinson: Because Brent Cole’s testimony was not relevant to the question... Haeg: I demanded him testify, Chuck, and everybody heard it and Brent Cole never showed up and we got on your billing records that he called you right after he got Jackie’s ticket that she bought for him so I could look him in the eye. He called you and then he never showed up Chuck! Robinson: Well you knew he wasn’t goanna show up David that was no surprise when we went to McGrath. Haeg: I bought him a ticket, Chuck. Robinson: You bought him a ticket I know. Haeg: And I never talked to him after that and I said I wanted to look him in the eye. Robinson: (indiscernible) a witness fee to but before stepped our foot in that courtroom in McGrath you knew he wasn’t coming to testify. Haeg: I don’t remember that Chuck. Tell me why I knew that Robinson: Because – because we talked about it and I told you there was no need to call him because what he had to say is not relevant to your guilt! Haeg: It would have been relevant to my sentence and you know it. Robinson: Why would it have been relevant to your sentence David Haeg: Because we had a deal that I’d given up a year of my freaking guide license for a bunch of other shit and I wanted that Judge to know that I in good faith just like she told Tony Zellers “you going in and given statements and everything is rehabilitation” and none of that ever came out that I went in and gave them a five hour interview and I wanted that man to be asked that and I wanted him to be asked why he never 101
Page 1 and 2:
Exhibit 1 AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARR
Page 3 and 4:
the GPS, or to mark the locations o
Page 5 and 6:
Haeg complains that I suborned perj
Page 8 and 9:
11/11/04 Recording of Cole while he
Page 10 and 11:
Cole: The thing that was taken away
Page 12 and 13:
you to protect my interest. I know
Page 14 and 15:
Cole: I don't know why he didn't do
Page 16 and 17:
Cole: Well I - I that's a difficult
Page 18 and 19:
Cole: But the only thing the DA sai
Page 20 and 21:
Cole: Do you remember me telling hi
Page 22 and 23:
Program -um- and initially I was la
Page 24 and 25:
Creek, take kids out of school, peo
Page 26 and 27:
Fitzgerald: That was really my firs
Page 28 and 29:
saw someone that if the State wante
Page 30 and 31:
the attorney client privilege and I
Page 32 and 33:
Haeg: ...think of a better way. -Um
Page 34 and 35:
Cole: In the past. Was. That's righ
Page 36 and 37:
Shaw: Mr. Haeg. Haeg: I'm sorry. Be
Page 38 and 39:
tell me." "Well I'm not happy they
Page 40 and 41:
Haeg: Ok so he changed his mind bef
Page 42 and 43:
Cole: "On Monday, November 8 th you
Page 44 and 45:
Cole: You thought it was. I didn't.
Page 46 and 47:
Exhibit 5 EXCERPT OF HAEG’S IMMUN
Page 48 and 49:
Exhibit 7 ZELLER’S IMMUNIZED STAT
Page 50 and 51: Trooper Gibbens: I don’t remember
Page 52 and 53: Exhibit 9 November 4, 2004: In the
Page 54 and 55: All of which is a Class A Misdemean
Page 56 and 57: wolves sealed. Haeg provided the in
Page 58 and 59: Exhibit 10 November 8, 2004: DAVE H
Page 60 and 61: Exhibit 11 November 8, 2004: In the
Page 62 and 63: Count IX That on or about March 26,
Page 64 and 65: On 3/22/04, Haeg and Zellars flew a
Page 66 and 67: Count V That on or about March 23,
Page 68 and 69: After calling in the report, Haeg a
Page 70 and 71: Exhibit 13 PROOF, WHICH IS STILL IN
Page 72 and 73: Both men have pleaded not guilty to
Page 74 and 75: But the state’s controversial pre
Page 76 and 77: Exhibit 15 RECORDINGS OF ROBINSON 7
Page 78 and 79: Robinson: Yeah I told you ... Haeg:
Page 80 and 81: Robinson: And so... Stoumbaugh: He
Page 82 and 83: Robinson: But that doesn’t addres
Page 84 and 85: Robinson: Listen what I’m saying
Page 86 and 87: Robinson: Yeah he told me about tha
Page 88 and 89: Robinson: I’m sorry David Haeg: a
Page 90 and 91: Robinson: Because after I had Joe i
Page 92 and 93: Haeg: Ok well the malpractice that
Page 94 and 95: Haeg: ... I was out to lunch. Robin
Page 96 and 97: ___________________________________
Page 98 and 99: Haeg: I just wasted a whole bunch o
Page 102 and 103: stood up for my deal and I wanted t
Page 104 and 105: Haeg: by me and Leaders the judge d
Page 106 and 107: was a bad guide”. Well what the h
Page 108 and 109: ROBINSON: Well I don’t know who y
Page 110 and 111: Why were you flying to McGrath Did
Page 112 and 113: 5. As soon as Mr. Leaders successfu
Page 114 and 115: 9. Should we also point out Leaders
Page 116 and 117: RETURN I served the above subpoena
Page 118 and 119: Exhibit 16 EXCERPT OF RECORD PROVIN
Page 120 and 121: Exhibit 18 Trooper Gibbens sworn te
Page 122 and 123: Exhibit 20 56 QUESTIONS FOR BRENT C
Page 124 and 125: 28. What was your response 29. Do y
Page 126 and 127: Exhibit 21 TROOPER GIBBENS FALSE TE
Page 128 and 129: Exhibit 24 TAPE RECORDINGS OF OSTER
Page 130 and 131: een a government wacky and she has
Page 132 and 133: plus the losses you had sustained a
Page 134 and 135: Mr. Osterman: Well you got - you go
Page 136 and 137: Mr. Osterman: I want you involved.
Page 138 and 139: OSTERMAN: Ok. (indecipherable) HAEG
Page 140 and 141: HAEG: Ok. OSTERMAN: Because lets fa
Page 142 and 143: OSTERMAN: Mm hmm. HAEG: He knew but
Page 144 and 145: out. You bring that up and it will
Page 146 and 147: OSTERMAN: You’ve - bear with me f
Page 148 and 149: HAEG: Yeah. OSTERMAN: …and the mi
Page 150 and 151:
OSTERMAN: Yeah they’re talking ab
Page 152 and 153:
HAEG: Got him on tape saying, “no
Page 154 and 155:
OSTERMAN: They give it to us. You d
Page 156 and 157:
things that have to be done yet to
Page 158 and 159:
OSTERMAN: Sure. HAEG: And now it lo
Page 160 and 161:
OSTERMAN: No. HAEG: Why not OSTERMA
Page 162 and 163:
HAEG: Yeah there’s was none. OSTE
Page 164 and 165:
HAEG: No it aint. That - that issue
Page 166 and 167:
HAEG: How long did we have the open
Page 168 and 169:
OSTERMAN: Well that’s what happen
Page 170 and 171:
looked like you know your - I mean
Page 172 and 173:
OSTERMAN: Ok. So Chuck’s screwed.
Page 174 and 175:
HAEG: So there’s no chance of Chu
Page 176 and 177:
HAEG: So I don’t even see why he
Page 178 and 179:
HAEG: How come I have Supreme Court
Page 180 and 181:
OSTERMAN: Right if a crime happen w
Page 182 and 183:
OSTERMAN: Not necessarily no. HAEG:
Page 184 and 185:
Mr. Osterman: What does that mean M
Page 186 and 187:
Mr. Osterman: No kidding. That's ex
Page 188 and 189:
Mr. Osterman: Well you didn't the o
Page 190 and 191:
carelessness or negligence but thos
Page 192 and 193:
Mr. Osterman: Well you're not deali
Page 194 and 195:
e on the record and when I get to t
Page 196 and 197:
Mr. Osterman: Well things that were
Page 198 and 199:
Mr. Haeg: - no it's what I have pro
Page 200 and 201:
you a permit to go shoot wolves wit
Page 202 and 203:
not going to work effectively. The
Page 204 and 205:
Mr. Osterman: Listen Mr. Haeg: ...
Page 206 and 207:
wheeled out this tape see and then
Page 208 and 209:
Mr. Haeg: Hey. Hey Mark you know wh
Page 210 and 211:
Mr. Haeg: I didn't mention that I k
Page 212 and 213:
Mr. Osterman: Well I know you tape
Page 214 and 215:
Mr. Osterman: Mm hmm. Mr. Haeg: Wel
Page 216 and 217:
Mr. Osterman: The other issue that
Page 218 and 219:
Law Office of Mark Osterman 215 Fid
Page 220 and 221:
already notified the Governor becau
Page 222 and 223:
or counsel's continuing representat
Page 224 and 225:
defense and should promptly comply
Page 226 and 227:
ing up that there was a Rule 11 Agr
Page 228 and 229:
228
Page 230 and 231:
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: Ok and -uh- f
Page 232 and 233:
MR. OSTERMAN: -Uh- Mr. Haeg you had
Page 234 and 235:
the same as hunting a deer out in t
Page 236 and 237:
I've ever seen in my life. I have r
Page 238 and 239:
MR. OSTERMAN: Well not necessarily
Page 240 and 241:
MR. OSTERMAN: I already told you th
Page 242 and 243:
information provided by Mr. Haeg -u
Page 244 and 245:
MR. OSTERMAN: Well I - you know aga
Page 246 and 247:
MR. HAEG: Ok and did he state how m
Page 248 and 249:
JACKIE HAEG: Yes he was - very. MR.
Page 250 and 251:
JACKIE HAEG: Yeah he felt the he -
Page 252 and 253:
to him along with the tons of casel
Page 254 and 255:
MR. HAEG: Because when I paid him h
Page 256 and 257:
we could have something we could li
Page 258 and 259:
EXHIBIT 26 STATE OF ALASKA 14 PAGE
Page 260 and 261:
conviction of a pro se defendant. M
Page 262 and 263:
his right to an attorney, he cannot
Page 264 and 265:
IV. Conclusion Based on the forgoin
Page 266 and 267:
Tamara Russell, Psy.D., MHC IV Lice
Page 268 and 269:
Haeg: If you made a Rule 11 Agreeme
Page 270 and 271:
Fitzgerald: I - I don't know how to
Page 272 and 273:
Fitzgerald: Yeah that's what I'm sa
Page 274 and 275:
statement made during plea negotiat
Page 276 and 277:
were using. They also found a spent
Page 278 and 279:
She also revoked Haeg’s guiding l
Page 280 and 281:
makes it a crime for any person lic
Page 282 and 283:
Haeg claims that Judge Murphy faile
Page 284 and 285:
At sentencing, the State is allowed
Page 286 and 287:
Once the case was remanded, Haeg
Page 288 and 289:
To support his claim under Alaska
Page 290 and 291:
Exhibit 32 JUDICIAL COMPLAINT DISMI
Page 292 and 293:
292
Page 294 and 295:
Exhibit 34 ABA BAR EXAM QUESTIONS A
Page 296 and 297:
selling their boats to avoid forfei
Page 298 and 299:
ear arms). B. The Second Variable -
Page 300 and 301:
Exhibit 35 SUCCESSFUL INEFFECTIVE A
Page 302 and 303:
to a defendant that it constitutes
Page 304 and 305:
United States v. Hernandez, 450 F.
Page 306 and 307:
Nance v. Ozmint, 626 S.E.2d 878 (S.
Page 308 and 309:
Instead, Haeg said, when he asked t
show all

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?