PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

or counsel's continuing representation. Such disclosure
should include communication of information reasonably
sufficient to permit the client to appreciate the
significance of any conflict or potential conflict of
interest. Brent Cole in his written contract with me stated
he does not and has not represented the State of Alaska and
that nothing will affect his representation in this matter.
After Brent Cole sabotaged my case and I became suspicious
this is what he told me: “I can’t piss Leaders off because
after you’re done I still have to make deals with him”. In
other words he started lying when he wrote my contract with
him. Chuck Robinson never gave me a hint that he was
protecting Brent Cole at my expense until I put two tape
recorders in front of him and asked him point blank. Chuck
Robinson even CHARGED ME for the very conversation with
Brent Cole when they figured out how to keep Brent Cole from
attending my sentencing that I had subpoenaed him to. I have
a Constitutional Right for
(e) In accepting payment of fees by one person for the
defense of another, defense counsel should be careful to
determine that he or she will not be confronted with a
conflict of loyalty since defense counsel's entire loyalty
is due the accused. Brent Cole’s loyalty was to the
Prosecutor and not to me even though I had hired him. This
is shown absolutely by the way he avoided “pissing Leaders
off” (the State Prosecutor) at my expense by lying to me
about my rights and the law. Chuck Robinson’s loyalty was
to Brent Cole and not to me as shown by his statements to
me of “your not paying me for an ineffective assistance
counsel claim against Brent Cole” and “I’m not supposed to
defend you in an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel claim
against Brent Cole”. Brent Cole stands to lose his entire
career and law firm if his ineffectiveness and malpractice
is exposed. Chuck Robinson and Brent Cole even worked
together to deprive me of my Constitutional Right to a
compulsory process to obtain witnesses in my favor when
they arranged for Brent Cole to not testify at my sentence
as he had been subpoenaed to do.
(i)
Defense counsel who is related to a prosecutor as
parent, child, sibling or spouse should not represent a
client in a criminal matter where defense counsel knows the
government is represented in the matter by such a
prosecutor. Nor should defense counsel who has a
significant personal or financial relationship with a
prosecutor represent a client in a criminal matter where
defense counsel knows the government is represented in the
matter by such prosecutor, except upon consent by the
client after consultation regarding the relationship.
Brent Cole told me many, many times on tape and in front of
witnesses “I can’t piss Leaders (the State Prosecutor) off
222