PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

information provided by Mr. Haeg –uh- as a result of rule 11
negotiations.
MR. ROM: Right and are you aware that Mr. Haeg –uh- that that information was filed
because Mr. Haeg insisted on going into open sentencing against his attorneys advice
MR. OSTERMAN: -Um- there was the issue of open sentencing but that was on a plea beyond
the initial rule 11 agreement.
MR. ROM: Correct and that...
MR. OSTERMAN: The initial rule 11 agreement I had heard had been accepted and then Scot
filed an amended information that alleged new material that was –uhreceived
out of the rule 11 negotiations.
MR. ROM: And –uh- nobody ever informed you that the reason that
happened is that Mr. Haeg insisted on going into open sentencing which
could have given him a 5 year license suspension – exposure
MR. OSTERMAN: –Uh- again I – I look back I don't agree with that
particular statement. My recollection of this particular file –uh- is that -um- Mr. Haeg -
um- had agreed to take a - a – a plea agreement that was initially offered that upon accepting the
plea agreement Mr. Leaders filed an amended information and the amended information
included additional information and then suddenly the rule 11 agreement was – the
(indecipherable) everything was turned off.
MR. ROM: And you weren't aware that the second amended information had significantly
higher penalties statutes attributed to it
MR. OSTERMAN: I – I do know that that was the case and that's one of the things that
concerned me is that the first rule 11 agreement got - got the information that
was used to be charged in the second amended information. It seemed
to me that that was –uh- there were several severe problems there.
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: Ok...
242