PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

ecause after you’re done I still have to make deals with
him”. Chuck Robinson said I wasn’t paying him to use Brent
Cole’s Ineffectiveness for my defense. This is an
absolutely unbelievable statement. Just what did Chuck
Robinson think I was paying him for
“One type of actual ineffectiveness claim warrants a similar,
though more limited, presumption of prejudice. In Cuyler v.
Sullivan, the Court held that prejudice is presumed when counsel
is burdened by an actual conflict of interest. In those
circumstances, counsel breaches the duty of loyalty, perhaps the
most basic of counsel's duties. Moreover, it is difficult to
measure the precise effect on the defense of representation
corrupted by conflicting interests. Given the obligation of
counsel to avoid conflicts of interest and the ability of trial
courts to make early inquiry in certain situations likely to give
rise to conflicts, see, e.g., Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 44(c), it is
reasonable for the criminal justice system to maintain a fairly
rigid rule of presumed prejudice for conflicts of interest. Even
so, the rule is not quite the per se rule of prejudice that
exists for the Sixth Amendment claims mentioned above. Prejudice
is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel
"actively represented conflicting interests" and that "an actual
conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's
performance.”
Standard 4-3.6 Prompt Action to Protect the Accused
Many important rights of the accused can be protected and
preserved only by prompt legal action. Defense counsel
should inform the accused of his or her rights at the
earliest opportunity and take all necessary action to
vindicate such rights. Defense counsel should consider all
procedural steps which in good faith may be taken,
including, for example, motions seeking pretrial release of
the accused, obtaining psychiatric examination of the
accused when a need appears, moving for change of venue or
continuance, moving to suppress illegally obtained
evidence, moving for severance from jointly charged
defendants, and seeking dismissal of the charges. Brent
Cole refused to look at my case with me and when I pointed
out the search warrants affidavit was based upon perjury he
told me it did not matter and took no action whatsoever.
Chuck Robinson told me the same thing along with “no matter
what Brent Cole did it is too late now to fix it”. Chuck
Robinson told me this over and over and over again.
Standard 4-3.8 Duty to Keep Client Informed
(a) Defense counsel should keep the client informed of the
developments in the case and the progress of preparing the
223