PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Exhibit 16
EXCERPT OF RECORD PROVING MURPHY & GIBBENS
RODE AROUND TOGETHER DURING HAEG'S CASE
[TR 1262]
MR. ROBINSON: Before we get going again I think we’re going to need about a 10-minute
break.
THE COURT: At least. I have to get to the store because I need some….
MR. ROBINSON: So why don’t we take long enough to go to the store and….
THE COURT: Get some diet Coke. And I’m going to commandeer Trooper Gibbens and his
vehicle to take me because I don’t have any transportation.
MR. ROBINSON: All right.
THE COURT: All right, Trooper Gibbens
TROOPER GIBBENS: Well, yeah.
Exhibit 17
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION
May 6, 2005
…There is another piece of evidence that needs to be addressed. At the time the first
amended information was filed there was no plea between defendant and the state. As is revealed
in Mr. Haeg’s affidavit, there were plea negotiations that took place between the parties before
the filing of the information but the parties failed to carry out any plea agreement. During the
plea negotiations defendant made statements to the police that were recited by the prosecutor in
his statement in support of the amended information.
The significance of this fact is that defendant’s statements made during plea negotiations
that do not end in a plea agreement are not usable in any judicial proceeding, including the filing
of an information (See Evidence Rule 410). Yet the prosecutor used these statements in support
of all three informations in violation of the evidence rule.
DATED at Soldotna, Alaska this 6 day of May 2005.
118