PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Mr. Osterman: I want you involved.
3/20/06 MEETING
Attorney Mark Osterman, David Haeg,
Greg Stoumbaugh, Jackie Haeg, & Cassie Haeg
OSTERMAN: Ok we have to review the transcripts of trial.
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: Second –um- after that we got to develop a timeline in the evidence -
whether there were issues of motions that should’ve been or could’ve been
brought that weren’t –um- whether there were –uh- the big one the big
give away the ineffective assistance by your first attorney. No doubt
about it. And then second we got to make a strategic move. Let me explain to you we've raised
the issue between PCR and the appeal. PCR is like the ace in the sleeve. We only pull that ace
out when everything else fails, ok
HAEG: Can you but don’t you have to use – to utilize ineffective assistance of counsel
don't you have to go back on a PCR to – to go back into the original trial
OSTERMAN: Well yeah but see PCR is a post conviction relief that has a – I believe it's
a two year limitation where as the appeal you filed for has a 30 day limitation. So to claim PCR
we've got a while to go you yet and we should expect and anticipate with proper filing before the
Court of Appeals you'll have an answer back before the two years is hit but if your appeal is
pending for that period of time the PCR time folds.
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: But the issue is if we deal with PCR ineffective assistance now are we
likely to get a reversal by the Court of Appeals And I think the likelihood is yes. I think
when the Court of Appeals sees the sell out...
HAEG: Ok.
136