PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Nance v. Ozmint, 626 S.E.2d 878 (S.C.) 549 U.S. 943 (2006) [Trial counsel’s failure to
investigate, plan, and present a defense constituted “a classic example of a complete breakdown
in the adversarial process”. [C]ounsel abandoned his role as defense counsel and if fact helped
bolster the case against his client…We again recognize that this type of “consistently inept form
of lawyer conduct [is not] acceptable in this state, nor will we employ a prejudice analysis, for
[defense] counsel’s ineffectiveness [is] so pervasive as to render a particularized prejudice
inquiry unnecessary.”
Exhibit 36
ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS CRAIG MEDRED ARTICLE
It's a complicated, ugly case against guide David Haeg
CRAIG MEDRED
OUTDOORS
(05/17/08 23:53:56)
When pilot and big-game guide David Haeg strayed outside the boundaries of a wolf
control area near McGrath in 2004 to slaughter some wolves, there is little doubt he
thought he was doing the right thing. Everyone involved with the wolf-killing program
for which the state had permitted Haeg understood the objective was killing wolves to
increase the survival chances for moose.
And even if Haeg and gunner Tony Zellers were technically outside the control area, they
were still operating within the boundaries of state Game Management Unit 19D, and the
state calls these things "Game Management Units" for a reason.
What were Haeg and Zellers doing anyway but helping to manage the game in Unit 19D
Unfortunately the state didn't see it that way. Under fire from animal activists upset about
the aerial gunning of wolves, the state saw in Haeg a chance to demonstrate that you can't
just let wolf-control run wild, to spin an old phrase from former Gov. Wally Hickel.
Still, in fairness to the Alaska state troopers and the state attorneys involved, it is near
certain they too thought they were doing the right thing when they busted Haeg.
306