PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Mr. Osterman: Well there is a (sic) out there that says that – I'll grant you but I don't think that
that's -uh- I don't think that's the end of the statement. Because see it's not Chuck Robinson I
would be focusing on. I would be focusing on Cole because Cole set up a by his conduct
absolutely malpractice. You gave the evidence to the District Attorney to use against you
because of Cole's conduct.
Haeg: Yep. But also what ramifications is it if I can prove that Troopers were perjuring
themselves during my trial and sentencing Will that not help in anyway
Mr. Osterman: Well you're goanna have to raise the issue to the Court of Appeals -you knowthat's
one of the things that's goanna happen which is while that I look at the -you know- like I
said the issues on appeal that you've got don't really seem to cover the issue on appeal.
Haeg: Yep.
Mr. Osterman: The whole goal would be #1 to stay forfeiture of the airplane and make sure all
the other stays are in place with regard to the case, #2 would be to get caught up on the trial
transcripts.
Haeg: Ok.
Mr. Osterman: Now in the meantime I don't mind going after Mr. Cole, ok But I think that
Mr. Cole ought to wait until after we've gotten our feet into the first round of appeals and feel
comfortable about the issues we're briefing out.
Haeg: Yep ok.
Mr. Osterman: Then we can pursue Mr. Cole. We actually have 2 years from the date of
malpractice, which is . . .
Mr. Osterman: Now the first thing we probably aught to do which I think you could do on your
own is to write a letter to him informing him that you're making a claim for your attorneys fees
131