PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Mr. Haeg: Yeah you did.
Mr. Osterman: Do not.
Mr. Haeg:
You said that you're not willing to interfere with other peoples livelihoods on my
behalf even though they committed – what'd you say like -uh- -uh- I don't know what you – they
committed horrendous and unbelievable acts.
Mr. Osterman: Are you there
Mr. Haeg:
And how do you bring – now this is one thing that really - really gets me. How can
you bring up stuff that's not on the record for the ineffective assistance of counsel claim in what
you put in there and not bring up the rest of it
Mr. Osterman: Because the Ineffective Assistance claim goes to the ability of the clients per –
I'm sorry – the attorneys performance on behalf of the client in the courtroom. That's the
Strickland criteria. The Strickland criteria isn't whether he called you a dunce outside a
courtroom or thought you were stupid. That's not Ineffective Assistance.
Mr. Haeg:
So when on the - the issue that you did bring up how was that in the courtroom
Tell - just explain that one to me.
Mr. Osterman: Well – well it relates to substantial rights that you have since you have a 4 th
and a 5 th amendment right those rights are substantial rights and he violated those particular
rights on your behalf in judicial matters. In matters before the Court. In the matters before the
Court were plea agreements because plea agreements are judicial matter. Don't believe me look
up Rule 11 in the criminal rules. It deals with the conduct of plea agreements.
Mr. Haeg:
And how come none of the stuff of him not -uh- saying that at my arraignment is in
there Because that was on the record
195