PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

9. Should we also point out Leaders states he "has provided a sworn factual basis for the charges
in the Second Amended Information" yet in fact he failed to do so This reinforces the idea the
information was not made on his "official oath".
Appeal Notes dated August 18, 2005
Dear Chuck,
I very much would like to have this included in our appeal. I strongly feel we should start
bringing out how poorly I’ve been treated by the State and I do feel that this is a legitimate basis
for appeal. The one weak item I can see is that we never did assert our right or privilege to go to
open sentencing before going to trial. Yet if you follow through with my line of reasoning we
were indeed penalized for trying to assert our right or privilege. In a way I think it is much like
how you can be penalized for actually committing a crime or attempting to commit a crime. I
would almost like to include the hardships that have followed since Mr. Leaders changed
charges: going to trial, being convicted of the harsher charges, wear and tear on me and my
family, all the expenses, etc, etc… I don’t know if this could possibly be included in your appeal
but as I said I would like to see it added if you think it has any merit what so ever. I also
understand that the annotations are not the actual part of the Constitution but they must have a
valid standing in fact somewhere. I even think that it would be nice to include
just how many of the States requirements that we fulfilled before the
State changed the deal. Such as giving them a map pointing out the wolf
kill sites, my & Tony’s interview with the State, and canceling my first
years hunts. Thanks again.
David
114