PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

courts to make early inquiry in certain situations likely to give
rise to conflicts, see, e.g., Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 44(c), it is
reasonable for the criminal justice system to maintain a fairly
rigid rule of presumed prejudice for conflicts of interest. Even
so, the rule is not quite the per se rule of prejudice that
exists for the Sixth Amendment claims mentioned above. Prejudice
is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel
"actively represented conflicting interests" and that "an actual
conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's
performance.”
When we meet in person again I want to be able to talk to you and
hopefully the person looking for tactics for my appeal and go
over the many US Supreme Court cases which I believe you may have
already copied which support our position. I also have found
that the American Bar Association Standards point out many more
situations Brent Cole was ineffective.
http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/standards/dfunc_toc.html
I have found a treasure trove of actions, which Brent Cole took
while representing me, that are in direct violation with these
Standards.
Standard 4-1.2
The Function of Defense Counsel
(a)
Counsel for the accused is an essential component
of the administration of criminal justice. A court properly
constituted to hear a criminal case must be viewed as a
tripartite entity consisting of the judge (and jury, where
appropriate), counsel for the prosecution, and counsel for
the accused. In other words if there is no counsel for the
accused there is no properly constituted court. Brent Cole
in failing to represent only my interests cannot be
considered counsel for the accused. Chuck Robinson, in
representing Brent Cole’s interests and not my own cannot
be considered counsel for the accused.
(b) The basic duty defense counsel owes to the
administration of justice and as an officer of the court is
to serve as the accused's counselor and advocate with
courage and devotion and to render effective, quality
representation. Brent Cole never ever advocated for me,
let alone advocated for me with courage and devotion, and I
have yet to find anywhere where he rendered quality
representation. The very first moment my wife Jackie and I
stepped foot in Mr. Cole’s office he made every effort to
impress upon my wife and I that there was absolutely no
hope and that the only thing we could do was to cooperate
with the State. He said, “The Prosecution has probably
219