PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

HAEG: Yeah and it was the first – I mean you guys did a pretty good of 15 almost 16
pages of that. I mean isn’t that – isn’t that the prosecutions job to make me out to be a bad guy
(Over 15 pages of a “very negative statement of facts” in a brief that is limited to 20 pages)
OSTERMAN: Uh huh.
HAEG: I thought you said that the thing – the big enchilada of Brent Cole we’re – we’re
hiding it in the back and goanna spring it on them later
OSTERMAN: The very first…
HAEG: What if it doesn’t get sprung on them
OSTERMAN: Well lets see if I got a copy of something handy here real quick… Every
time the Court of Appeals begins a case – it begins a case with a factual statement. These are the
facts of this case. Ok
HAEG: And look for people that - I mean is that factual basis for what’s going on
OSTERMAN: Listen the factual basis of this case is that they brought you under
criminal hunting license violations instead of under civil -um- permit violations.
HAEG: Well it still would have been criminal.
OSTERMAN: No they wouldn’t have been.
HAEG: Yeah they would have been.
OSTERMAN: But taking that particular position what I’m saying is the issues
that we’re facing are not issues of broad general constitutional
applications.
HAEG: Yeah they are…
OSTERMAN: No they aren’t.
HAEG: … Ineffective assistance of counsel is – that’s one of the mightiest.
OSTERMAN: And it is one of the very last ones that we talk about because there’s a…
HAEG: Why don’t you on -uh- the ineffective assistance of counsel
put in there that Brent Cole was lying to us And I can prove it.
Wouldn’t that be something to note
159