15.01.2015 Views

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42. Do you think it just that Mr. Leaders can ignore the concessions made to the Rule<br />

11 agreement by Mr. Haeg such as providing the map, statement, cancellation <strong>of</strong> a whole seasons<br />

hunts, and all the money and time wasted on the McGrath trip <strong>of</strong> November 9, 2004<br />

43. At any time did Mr. Leaders indicate he was going to file charges in connection<br />

with Doug Jayo’s moose hunt in September 2003<br />

44. Was there ever a deal that in return for Mr. Haeg to discuss the moose hunt he<br />

would not be charged in connection with the moose hunt<br />

45. Wasn’t the exact opposite true<br />

46. That Mr. Haeg requested he be charged in connection with Mr. Jayo’s moose hunt<br />

so it could not influence the outcome <strong>of</strong> the wolf issue<br />

47. Did you ever state to Mr. Haeg, “When Leaders screwed you he also screwed me”<br />

48. Did you ever make a statement to the effect that Mr. Leaders broke the Rule 11<br />

deal because it was likely Magistrate Murphy would be lenient and not order forfeiture <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Haeg’s airplane<br />

49. Mr. Cole have you ever been a prosecutor for the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong><br />

50. Do you think Mr. Haeg has been treated legally, fairly and with justice by you, Mr.<br />

Leaders, and the system so far<br />

51. You have maintained there were “many deals” yet is it not true there was only one<br />

deal that both Mr. Haeg and Mr. Leaders agreed to<br />

52. The same one Mr. Leaders broke on November 8, 2004<br />

53. Did Mr. Haeg ever agree to forfeit the PA-12 airplane without that being decided<br />

by Magistrate Murphy<br />

54. After Mr. Leaders broke the first Rule 11 agreement did he <strong>of</strong>fer to make a new<br />

Rule 11 agreement which first required Mr. Haeg to forfeit the PA-12 airplane<br />

55. If the <strong>State</strong> broke the first Rule 11 agreement yet got to keep what was conceded<br />

by Mr. Haeg why would they not break the second Rule 11 agreement and keep the PA-12<br />

airplane<br />

56. What is the sense <strong>of</strong> anyone making a Rule 11 agreement with the <strong>State</strong> if the <strong>State</strong><br />

can break it and keep what was given up and promised by the defendant<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!