PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Cole: You thought it was. I didn't.
Haeg: Ok. So – did I ever tell you that it was important for my livelihood
Cole: You did.
Haeg: Ok. Did the State offer a hearing so I could get my plane back
Cole: Nope.
Haeg: Why not
Cole: Cause they intended to forfeit it from the very beginning. It was used in the commission
of a crime.
Haeg: Ok. You guys need to be taking notes here.
Shaw: (...) take some...
Haeg: Ok. So ok. As my attorney are you supposed to know the law Or when you were my
attorney were you supposed to know law that would help me
Cole: Yes.
Haeg: And if you didn't know the law were you supposed to research it
Cole: If I thought it was applicable I tried, yes.
Haeg: Ok – applicable. Now this is kind of a question. If the State was required to give me a
hearing and you never told me and I was deprived of my constitutional rights of due process -
um- oh if the State was required to give me a hearing and you never told
me was I deprived of my constitutional right of due process
Cole: Show me where the State's required to give you a hearing.
Haeg: –Uh- look at your exhibit that you brought in.
Cole: Ok.
Haeg: –Uh- yes. It's American Eagle versus State 620 P.2d 657… Ok would you agree that it –
this is also the correct "When the seized property is used by its owner in
earning a livelihood," and seized property is used by its owner in earning
44