PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption
PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption
PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Standard 4-3.2 Interviewing the Client<br />
(a) As soon as practicable, defense counsel should seek to<br />
determine all relevant facts known to the accused. In so<br />
doing, defense counsel should probe for all legally<br />
relevant information without seeking to influence the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> the client's responses. Brent Cole never<br />
allowed me to discuss the case with him and in fact when I<br />
brought out things such as perjury to obtain the search<br />
warrants Brent Cole dismissed them as not important. Chuck<br />
Robinson was extremely careful to never admit that there<br />
was the huge Constitutional defense <strong>of</strong> Ineffective<br />
Assistance <strong>of</strong> Counsel even after I and everyone else with<br />
me told him <strong>of</strong> the unbelievable actions <strong>of</strong> Brent Cole in<br />
lying about my rights and the law to me. Chuck Robinson<br />
also told me that the perjury to obtain the search warrants<br />
“didn’t matter”. I had to literally hire Chuck Robinson’s<br />
investigator myself to have him help me look into Brent<br />
Cole’s lying and deceit. The investigator and I found all<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> evidence proving Brent Cole's intentional<br />
malpractice. Chuck Robinson also told me if I told anyone<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brent Cole's actions it would jeopardize his “tactic”<br />
which I (and many other attorneys) later proved was<br />
absolutely worthless.<br />
Standard 4-3.5 Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />
(a) Defense counsel should not permit his or her<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment or obligations to be affected by his<br />
or her own political, financial, business, property, or<br />
personal interests. Brent Cole had an obvious and actual<br />
conflict <strong>of</strong> interest by trying to represent me while<br />
preserving and enhancing his ability to make deals with the<br />
<strong>State</strong>. Once the <strong>State</strong> made it extremely clear how big <strong>of</strong> a<br />
deal it was for them to convict and sentence harshly on such<br />
a high pr<strong>of</strong>ile case (Politically charged National News) it<br />
made it more improbable that Brent Cole would do anything on<br />
my behalf that would jeopardize his relationship with the<br />
<strong>State</strong> Prosecution. Chuck Robinson protected Brent Cole's<br />
gross malpractice and thus career and law firm at my<br />
expense-even though I paid Chuck Robinson almost $30,000 to<br />
represent ME AND MY FAMILY. And if representing me meant<br />
exposing Brent Cole’s gross malpractice that is exactly what<br />
he should have done.<br />
(b) Defense counsel should disclose to the defendant at the<br />
earliest feasible opportunity any interest in or connection<br />
with the case or any other matter that might be relevant to<br />
the defendant's selection <strong>of</strong> counsel to represent him or her<br />
221