15.01.2015 Views

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Standard 4-3.2 Interviewing the Client<br />

(a) As soon as practicable, defense counsel should seek to<br />

determine all relevant facts known to the accused. In so<br />

doing, defense counsel should probe for all legally<br />

relevant information without seeking to influence the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> the client's responses. Brent Cole never<br />

allowed me to discuss the case with him and in fact when I<br />

brought out things such as perjury to obtain the search<br />

warrants Brent Cole dismissed them as not important. Chuck<br />

Robinson was extremely careful to never admit that there<br />

was the huge Constitutional defense <strong>of</strong> Ineffective<br />

Assistance <strong>of</strong> Counsel even after I and everyone else with<br />

me told him <strong>of</strong> the unbelievable actions <strong>of</strong> Brent Cole in<br />

lying about my rights and the law to me. Chuck Robinson<br />

also told me that the perjury to obtain the search warrants<br />

“didn’t matter”. I had to literally hire Chuck Robinson’s<br />

investigator myself to have him help me look into Brent<br />

Cole’s lying and deceit. The investigator and I found all<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> evidence proving Brent Cole's intentional<br />

malpractice. Chuck Robinson also told me if I told anyone<br />

<strong>of</strong> Brent Cole's actions it would jeopardize his “tactic”<br />

which I (and many other attorneys) later proved was<br />

absolutely worthless.<br />

Standard 4-3.5 Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

(a) Defense counsel should not permit his or her<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment or obligations to be affected by his<br />

or her own political, financial, business, property, or<br />

personal interests. Brent Cole had an obvious and actual<br />

conflict <strong>of</strong> interest by trying to represent me while<br />

preserving and enhancing his ability to make deals with the<br />

<strong>State</strong>. Once the <strong>State</strong> made it extremely clear how big <strong>of</strong> a<br />

deal it was for them to convict and sentence harshly on such<br />

a high pr<strong>of</strong>ile case (Politically charged National News) it<br />

made it more improbable that Brent Cole would do anything on<br />

my behalf that would jeopardize his relationship with the<br />

<strong>State</strong> Prosecution. Chuck Robinson protected Brent Cole's<br />

gross malpractice and thus career and law firm at my<br />

expense-even though I paid Chuck Robinson almost $30,000 to<br />

represent ME AND MY FAMILY. And if representing me meant<br />

exposing Brent Cole’s gross malpractice that is exactly what<br />

he should have done.<br />

(b) Defense counsel should disclose to the defendant at the<br />

earliest feasible opportunity any interest in or connection<br />

with the case or any other matter that might be relevant to<br />

the defendant's selection <strong>of</strong> counsel to represent him or her<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!