PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

looked like you know your – I mean to me I sent you the - the stuff that I wanted in or why I was
so pissed about Brent Cole and Chuck Robinson.
OSTERMAN: And you’re interested…
HAEG: And not hardly any of that - I mean none of it is in here. And I can’t be
that mistaken. I’m a very – very intelligent person. I read like the freaking wind. You know how
much material I’ve been through
OSTERMAN: Mm hmm. I understand.
HAEG: You don’t think that any of that would rub off on me
OSTERMAN: I think it would.
HAEG: But…
OSTERMAN: At the same time – here’s the realization Dave. In spite of all that you’ve
read - most of which deals with malpractice – not ineffective assistance. Different things. They
are a much different things.
HAEG: How come there are always tied lied like this
OSTERMAN: They’re tied in the civil context like this. They’re not tied that in the
criminal context.
HAEG: How come every criminal malpractice claim had to have an ineffective
assistance of counsel before it could happen
OSTERMAN: True.
HAEG: So – ok because you know that don’t you think that every criminal malpractice
claim is something very important to look at
OSTERMAN: Let me give you an example. Ineffective assistance of counsel is I don’t
call your wife as a witness, I – we leave her at home, we don’t give her a subpoena, we don’t
invite her to come to the trial, she doesn’t testify but she’s the one who established your alibi –
your whereabouts. If I don’t call her is that a tactic error or is that a technical error
HAEG: I don’t know.
OSTERMAN: To me it’s a fatal error. Ok. Any attorney who doesn’t listen to his
client’s witnesses is a damn fool. So if you tell me here’s 15 names. I’m subpoenaing 15 names.
Ok. I’m goanna send out subpoenas. Why…
170