PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

OSTERMAN: That’s right. I mean they’re like anybody else. They don’t want to read
garbage.
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: So we – we – we’re trying to spruce up the facts to make it a chitleread
() As I recall we got about 12 pages of facts and I think after I talked to Joel and – and we
looked back at it we’re down to about 7 or 8 pages now of facts which is pretty good. Uh…
(01:23)
HAEG: And what do you mean the facts Like of us going out and doing what we did or
what
OSTERMAN: Well yeah if you’ll remember the very beginning of that we have to recite
to the court what happened. And then what happened in court. Now one of the things
that’s not necessarily in the statement of facts deals with what happened
with Cole – necessarily.
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: Because the – the whole – the whole fact is we need to convince three
members of the Court of Appeals this thing ought to be reversed. That there’s been an injustice
done. And the only way we can get that flavor to them is that we describe it. Ok. Case law be
damned if we don’t take care of the facts of the case and make this an easy read for them. They’ll
sacrifice us at the alter of stupidity. Ok
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: So I need your input in this if you can get it to me by the end of the week.
HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: With that we want this thing just simply a matter of the mechanics. We
want – we have to go through – let me – bear with me – if you look at the bottom of each
footnote you’ll see a statement that just simply says citation. Or makes some reference to a
hearing transcript. Well we’ve got to go through it and augment it – supplement it. And we also
have to create a table of statutes, a table of um of cases, a table of authorities – generally, an
additional table of authorities and then we’ve got to re-footnote everything and we got to run a
master on the footnote for locations under a table of contents. So we’ve got a lot of mechanical
155