PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

you know of anything else – like testify against a co-defendant or whatever – I usually want to
get that in writing.
Haeg: Ok
Robinson: If the client agrees to do it get that in writing. Just say that this is just – you know this
is – we’re making this agreement here that we’re goanna do this.
Haeg: Yep and most other attorneys that you know of would follow the same approach
Robinson: That’s a reasonable approach to follow.
Stoumbaugh: Dave seems to think that since – uh - Brent Cole had made this deal with the State
and then he didn’t get anything in writing that - that was a definite clear-cut case of ineffective
counsel. I’m mean he actually just pretty much said “here - here’s Dave’s hide, take it”.
Haeg: And do you Chuck – do you – do you know what ineffective assistance of counsel
means
Robinson: I just want to know whether you’re dissatisfied with anything that I’ve done
Because if you are we need to get that out on the table now.
Haeg: Um – have you ever heard of ineffective assistance of counsel
Robinson: Yes I know what ineffective assistance of counsel is – I represent people...
Haeg: Do you think that there would be any case against Brent Cole for ineffective assistance of
counsel
Robinson: On what issue
Haeg: Him giving – having me – telling me that it was virtually mandatory to give the State a 5-
hour interview and maps and having nothing in writing. What do you think about that
Robinson: Having nothing in writing as to what you were going to get in exchange for that
Haeg: Exchange or anything in writing whatsoever for anything.
Robinson: Well that you were not going to get something in exchange for it or – or what David
I’m not quite sure I understand where you’re going. Well here’s the problem is that I wasn’t
there...Scot’s position is “I didn’t back out of a deal. David Haeg backed out of the deal”.
Stoumbaugh: His point here...
Haeg: Ok – ok
79