PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

HAEG: Why - why is that not the case
OSTERMAN: Because you’re goanna have to get out of this case on your merits and if
you can’t…
HAEG: Oh I think I got merit. I think I got constitutional right to effective assistance of
counsel.
OSTERMAN: You do. And you did not receive effective assistance of counsel.
HAEG: And why won’t that reverse my conviction
OSTERMAN: Listen what Cole said is not the issue. What Cole did is always the issue.
HAEG: Yeah he deni[ed] – he did – he denied me my constitutional rights to uphold that deal
and he lied to me about when he found out to cover-up what was going on. And he just… And
then he never even squeaked about them using all of my statements to file all these charges.
Chuck Robinson could have used Brent Cole’s ineffectiveness. It’s so glaringly obvious that…
And you may be you are correct when you told me that the Court of Appeals is goanna throw my
case out if I go after Brent Cole and Chuck Robinson. You may be correct but you know what
the Court of – the Alaska Court of Appeals is not my last court – my last court that I’ll be seeing
is it
OSTERMAN: That’s correct.
HAEG: Just – how that bear on the rest of it Read the rest of it.
OSTERMAN: Ok. “The statement of the law is always true. The statements inadmissible
if made at any point during the discussions in which the defendant seeks to obtain concessions
from the government in return for plea, plea bargaining is to be evaluated according to the
standard of ‘caveat prosecutor”.
HAEG: And what’s that mean
OSTERMAN: Caveat means beware. So beware Mr. Prosecutor. If you offer a deal you
better beware.
HAEG: And what – so like when I was offered a deal why didn’t he have to beware Or
why didn’t he ever get his tit caught in a wringer
167