PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

MR. OSTERMAN: Well I – you know again (laughs) I intended to use
it as an issue on appeal. I wasn't there to bring any ethics charges
against Brent Cole nor was I there to –uh- to –uh- -um- file any claims
for malpractice but I felt that there was some strong issues about Mr.
Cole failure to protect your rights.
MR. HAEG: Ok and...
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: Last question.
MR. HAEG: ...Mr. Rom has made it very clear or tried to because to me it's very unclear. Now
you specifically tell the court here what the state of plea agreements were from one month before
there was supposed to be completed to the time in which they would – they were broke off and
who broke them off - because I told you many times and I showed you the evidence. Who broke
the deal and how did they do it and when did they do it
MR. ROM: I'm goanna object to the question. This witness...
MR. OSTERMAN: Well I – I ...
MR. ROM: I'm goanna object to the question...
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: Whoa – whoa – whoa Mr. Osterman – Mr. Osterman hold
on there's an objection. Go ahead Mr. Rom.
MR. ROM: –Uh- this witness has no personal knowledge of that.
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: But...(indecipherable)
MR. HAEG: He has seen the evidence. He had no personal...
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: Whoa – whoa...
MR. HAEG: He has no personal knowledge of what his question was about all of the other
stuff. He just had Mr. Osterman testify about all this stuff – of – that I'm the one that broke the
rule agreement and Mr. Osterman got all that on. Well how does he have personal knowledge of
that
MAGISTRATE WOODMANCY: He was not a party – he's asking – he asked if in his review
of the case he was aware of these things.
244