PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Mr. Haeg cannot understand how Mr. Leaders can now claim that the issue of whether he was
governed by predator control regulations or hunting regulations is now a legal issue rater than a
factual issue when in response to my motion for dismissal Mr. Leaders stated “the mere fact that
the defendant could have been charged under AS 16.05.783 does not preclude the State from
proceeding under AS 8.54.720. The issue of whether the defendant killed the wolves in question
under the authority of the predator control permit is a factual issue to be left up to the trier of
fact and is not a basis for pretrial disposition of this case.”
Mr. Haeg cannot understand how you can strike down his motion on the basis it is a factual
issue for the jury to decide and then even consider granting Mr. Leaders motion on the basis it is
now a legal issue not for the jury to decide.
Mr. Haeg again requests Mr. Leaders current motion and your response to be in writing.
Thank you Chuck, if you have any questions please give me a call.
Sincerely,
Dave Haeg
P.O. Box 123
Soldotna, AK 99669
262-9249
Robinson Sentencing Questions for Tom Stepnosky
Did Mr. Haeg ask Mr. Cole what could be done about Mr. Leaders breaking of the rule 11
agreement by filing harsher charges
What was Mr. Cole’s response to Mr. Haeg’s question
Do you remember if Mr. Haeg on multiple occasions asked Mr. Cole if he had been able to
lodge a complaint with Mr. Leaders boss
What was Mr. Cole’s response
Did you drive to Anchorage the afternoon of November 8, 2004 to meet with Mr. Haeg’s
attorney Brent Cole and with the intention of flying to McGrath at 8:00 am November 9 th to
execute the Rule 11 agreement between Mr. Haeg and Mr. Leaders
109