PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

already notified the Governor because this is such a
politically charged case” and “we need to stop this before
it snowballs out of control” and “I recommend cooperating
with the State” and “One of the main jobs of an attorney is
to keep the client from the stress of having to deal with
the prosecutor by himself”. Chuck Robinson placed
protecting Brent Cole's career and law firm far above
advocating for me and thus gave me neither devotion nor
effective, quality representation.
(d) Defense counsel, in common with all members of the bar, is
subject to standards of conduct stated in statutes, rules,
decisions of courts, and codes, canons, or other standards of
professional conduct. Defense counsel has no duty to execute any
directive of the accused, which does not comport with law or such
standards. Defense counsel is the professional representative of
the accused, not the accused's alter ego. Although defense
counsel has no duty to execute any directive of the accused which
does not comport with law or such standards I believe this
implies that defense counsel has every duty to comply to execute
any directive of the accused this does comport with law or such
standards. Brent Cole lied to me on many different aspects of
the law to avoid executing my directives. Chuck Robinson, on
tape and in front of multiple witnesses, refused to utilize Brent
Cole’s gross and intentional sabotaging of my case for my
defense, even though I asked him directly to do so. Chuck
Robinson told me on tape that he had NO duty to point out or
utilize this intentional sabotaging of my case. Chuck Robinson
even told me that Brent Cole lying to me about the law and my
rights did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. In a
later taped conversation Chuck Robinson admitted that if Brent
Cole lied about anything of substance this WOULD constitute
ineffective assistance of counsel.
(f) Defense counsel should not intentionally misrepresent
matters of fact or law to the court. I believe the single
most important obligation of an attorney is to not
intentionally misrepresent matters of fact or law TO HIS
CLIENT. This rule is so obvious that I have yet to find it
spelled out in any book of rules or professional conduct.
Yet Brent Cole and Chuck Robinson, while taking money from
me, deceived, misrepresented, and lied to me about the law
to sabotage my case. Although this is not spelled out
directly anywhere in the Rules and Laws of Professional
Conduct I believe this is implicitly implied anywhere it
states that an attorney owes his client his entire loyalty
free from conflicts of interests. AN ATTORNEY WHO IS LYING
TO HIS OWN CLIENT IS FAR WORSE THAN THE CLIENT HAVING NO
ATTORNEY AT ALL! THE CLIENT IS ACTUALLY PAYING TO SABOTAGE
HIS OWN CASE!
220