PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Dear Magistrate Woodmancy:
RE: Haeg, David
DOB: 01/19/66
API #: 11111
CT REF #: 4MC-04-024 CR
Pursuant to your Order for Examination for Competency to Continue Legal Proceedings and
capability of conducting a legal defense without counsel, the following report is prepared. Mr.
Haeg was evaluated as an outpatient in the psychological testing area at API. The warnings
concerning limited confidentiality, and the fact that copies of my report would be distributed by
your chambers was explained to Mr. Haeg. The defendant consented to participate in the
examination.
IDENTIFYING DATA: Mr. Haeg is a 40-year-old Caucasian male who lives near Soldotna. He
has worked for more than 20 years as a hunting guide. He is married, has children and completed
high school.
PERTINENT HISTORY: Mr. Haeg has been charged with 11 counts of violating state game
regulation, and is in the process of appealing the court's earlier decision regarding these charges.
CURRENT PSYCHIATRIC CONDITION: Mr. Haeg does not have a mental disease or defect,
has not been prescribed medications to treat a mental health condition, and is not receiving
mental health therapy at this time.
ISSUES RELATED TO COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL: Mr. Haeg was interviewed
extensively regarding his knowledge of the charges against him, his perception of the seriousness
of those charges, his understanding of possible legal alternatives available to him, and his
understanding of the process involved with this court case. He was able to exhibit a very clear
understanding of not only the charges against him, but of the various legal alternatives that he
could select from. He is also able to present a logical argument for self representation, and is
cognizant of the challenges that he may face in doing so. He did state that he has begun to look
for legal consultation, and presented arguments in regards to pitfalls of utilizing a lawyer who
actively practices in Alaska at this time. His mental status examination does not suggest any
deficits in memory, comprehension or reasoning skills. His level of intellectual functioning falls
in at least the average range, and may be somewhat higher than average based on his
understanding of vocabulary, and ability to reason and comprehend abstract concepts.
It is, therefore, my professional opinion that Mr. Haeg may be found Competent to Continue
Legal Proceedings at this time. He also demonstrates the mental capability to conduct his own
defense, and is clearly aware of the pros and cons of making such a choice.
If I may answer additional questions or be of further service, please contact me at 269-7100.
Respectfully,
“s/”
265