PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

into his mind and say he was advocating for you here and there he wasn't. They say that when
you can prove a conflict of interest you do not have to prove prejudice because the likelihood of
prejudice is so overwhelming that you do not have to prove it. Well whose loyalties did I have
when Mr. Osterman after telling me all of the bad things my attorneys did refuse to put it into my
brief and told me he couldn't do so because it would "affect the lives and livelihoods" of my
attorneys I hired someone to look out for my life and livelihood and if someone else's actions
when I hired them to represent me and they did it so badly that I got placed in a horrible hole and
it was their conduct but the only way for me to be leveraged out of my hole to justice and a fair
trial is to affect their lives and livelihood so be it. It isn't my responsibility to accept the damage
of my attorneys who committed such horrible things against me. They have to take – be
responsible for what they did against me. And Mark Osterman said he was not willing to show
what my attorneys did that robbed me of my right to a fair trial – he was not willing to show the
court that and that is one of the most egregious things that has ever happened in the history of the
United States.
MR. ROM: Did you tape record conversations with Mr. Osterman
MR. HAEG: Yes.
MR. ROM: -Um- all of them
MR. HAEG: Yes.
MR. ROM: From the very beginning
MR. HAEG: I believe so.
MR. ROM: You talked about the Strickland and Risher test. Do you know what the Risher test
is
MR. HAEG: Yes.
MR. ROM: What is it
MR. HAEG: It is the test to determine whether you have a valid ineffective assistance of
counsel claim.
MR. ROM: What conflict of interest did Osterman have
MR. HAEG: He told me, in no uncertain words, that by putting stuff in what my former
attorneys did would affect their lives and livelihoods.
MR. ROM: Why is that a conflict of interest
253