PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Mr. Osterman: That's not the question ...
Mr. Haeg: Yeah it is.
Mr. Osterman: and not the statement that you made. No it is not.
Mr. Haeg: Yeah it is. I said that isn't it ...
Mr. Osterman:
You said as a generality lawyers try to hide their own and that is a false
statement.
Mr. Haeg: I tried to – I said that the courts have said that as a general rule ...
Mr. Osterman: That is not the general rule that is a case – a completely different case then the
standards I've told you about. I've told you to focus on Strickland. If you're goanna write your
own appeal Dave you'd better go back and look at Strickland and understand what the criteria is.
Mr. Haeg: I can damn near quote it to you verbatim.
Mr. Osterman: Then lets hear it.
Mr. Haeg:
It says that there's two prongs. First prong is that you have to prove that there was
actions of your attorney that would not be taken by a reasonably diligent attorney acting in a
conscientious behalf on his client and it must be just you know that – essentially what they're
saying is an average – a normal attorney would not commit the action. And then the second
prong is that action had to have an adverse effect on your case. An adverse effect is there's a
reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different. Well Brent Cole by having
him do all this shit, and lying to me about not being able to keep the Rule 11 in place, so I ended
up going to trial, and Chuck Robinson lying to me about me not being able to enforce the Rule
11 Agreement and whatever, I ended up with a 6 year license suspension. That will cost me
close to 5 million dollars when it's borne out. Now the deal that I had was a 1 to 3 year license
revocation dependent on my culpability in a moose hunt.
213