PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Fitzgerald: That was really my first -uh- significant contact with Mr. Leaders I had no reason to
believe he wasn't a person of his word. There are certainly that occurred in this
particular case that would leave me subsequently to be more careful
about his representations.
Haeg: Ok. -Um- did you trust Mr. – you answered now that you. At the time I made my deal did
you trust Mr. Leaders
Fitzgerald: I don't know at the point that -um- you made the deal and – and what deal you
might have been talking about. I can tell you that I became concerned about Mr.
Leaders representations when I was informed by Mr. Cole that he had
some hesitation or wouldn't be honoring the -um- the immunity – the
"king for a day".
Haeg: Ok. I was thinking of something else. Can you explain you said you had questions about
what – what was that exactly
Fitzgerald: At various points I had concerns about Mr. Leaders word.
Haeg: Ok and you'd said December and then November 8 th and 10 th . Can you say December of
what year
Fitzgerald: I think it was December of – December -uh- it – it - it's consistent with exhibit 1. -
Um- December 23 with regard to the review of correspondence regarding "king for a day" from
Mr. Cole and it - it leads me to believe that – that he and I had a discussion
around that time with regard to whether Mr. Leaders was goanna honor
the "king for a day".
Haeg: Well is there something other than the king – and I don't know what king for a day but is
there something other than this that describes the "king for a day" that you say Mr. Leaders didn't
want to honor
Metzger: When you say this you're (...) exhibit number 1
Haeg: Ok – yep.
Fitzgerald: At – at various junctures in the proceeding I had concerns about Mr. Leaders word.
This is an example of one of them. Is that in approximately December when I
believe Mr. Cole informed me that Mr. Leaders was [not] goanna honor
26