PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

OSTERMAN: Ok. So Chuck’s screwed. The point being Cole – there’s no ineffective
assistance claim – or there’s nothing in there that will keep you from not suing Cole. Cole was
not your trial attorney – he did not cause the [d] – cause the downfall. But Cole did cause…
HAEG: He helped and Chuck never – Chuck – Brent was the beginning of the landslide
and Chuck’s job was to stop the landslide and all Chuck did was jump on ride the landslide.
OSTERMAN: Cause he thought he could control it.
HAEG: Well not when my constitutional rights and my ability to provide – provide for
my family. I’m not goanna let him just jump onto the landslide.
OSTERMAN: Do you think that Chuck could stand in front of a jury and point a finger
at Cole
HAEG: I sure could. If I can why can’t Chuck
OSTERMAN: Not relevant.
HAEG: Why not
OSTERMAN: Cause that’s – irrelevant to a jury – to your jury. He couldn’t do that in
front of a jury.
HAEG: He doesn’t do it in front of a jury – he just – he should have brought it to the –
the judge…
OSTERMAN: That’s what I said. He thought he could control a landslide. Chuck –
Chuck…
HAEG: What is the reason legitimate reason There is none. Well my attorney that I paid
thousands of dollars for comes and tells me “you got screwed and that’s the way it is” and it was
his job to not let me get screwed.
OSTERMAN: Ok. So the documents contained here you have a lot of
trouble with the first two. You have a little trouble with the 3 rd and you
don’t think that the 4 th and 5 th are tight enough.
HAEG: I didn’t get a fair – this whole system. This whole and I guess I’ll bring it up
because I already brought it up. -Um- would you classify Dale Dolifka as an intelligent man
OSTERMAN: Fairly - yeah.
HAEG: Would you classify him as an honest man
172